Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inproceedings{1465136,
author = {Ščavnický, Jakub and Karolyi, Matěj and Růžičková, Petra and Pokorná, Andrea and Harazim, Hana and Štourač, Petr and Komenda, Martin},
address = {New York},
booktitle = {PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS)},
editor = {Maria Ganzha, Leszek Maciaszek, Marcin Paprzycki},
keywords = {Correlation; education; medical diagnostic imaging; databases; tools; automobiles},
howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
language = {eng},
location = {New York},
isbn = {978-83-949419-5-6},
pages = {109-116},
publisher = {IEEE},
title = {Pitfalls in users' evaluation of algorithms for text-based similarity detection in medical education},
url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8490018},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1465136
AU - Ščavnický, Jakub - Karolyi, Matěj - Růžičková, Petra - Pokorná, Andrea - Harazim, Hana - Štourač, Petr - Komenda, Martin
PY - 2018
TI - Pitfalls in users' evaluation of algorithms for text-based similarity detection in medical education
PB - IEEE
CY - New York
SN - 9788394941956
KW - Correlation
KW - education
KW - medical diagnostic imaging
KW - databases
KW - tools
KW - automobiles
UR - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8490018
L2 - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8490018
N2 - This paper introduces a user evaluation of several approaches for an automated similarity detection between study materials and curriculum description in the field of medical and healthcare education. Our objective is to present an effective methodology of getting relevant feedback from medical students and teachers. Two various data sets (electronic study materials represented by interactive educational algorithms on the AKUTNE.CZ platform and the curriculum of the General Medicine study programme) are processed. For the purposes of this work, text similarity between two data sets is expressed lexically, i.e. character-based (n-gram) similarity as well as term-based similarity methods are used. We present the comparison of five selected approaches to similarity calculation as well as an objective discussion covering our experience with and pitfalls of user evaluation.
ER -
ŠČAVNICKÝ, Jakub, Matěj KAROLYI, Petra RŮŽIČKOVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ, Hana HARAZIM, Petr ŠTOURAČ and Martin KOMENDA. Pitfalls in users' evaluation of algorithms for text-based similarity detection in medical education. Online. In Maria Ganzha, Leszek Maciaszek, Marcin Paprzycki. \textit{PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS)}. New York: IEEE, 2018, p.~109-116. ISBN~978-83-949419-5-6.
|
