CHRASTINA, Jan, Zdeněk NOVÁK, Tomáš ZEMAN, Jitka KOČVAROVÁ, Martin PAIL, Irena DOLEŽALOVÁ, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ and Milan BRÁZDIL. Single-center long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: A 10-17 year follow-up study. Seizure-European journal of epilepsy. London: W.B. Saunders Ltd., 2018, vol. 59, JUL 2018, p. 41-47. ISSN 1059-1311. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2018.04.022.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Single-center long-term results of vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: A 10-17 year follow-up study
Authors CHRASTINA, Jan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Zdeněk NOVÁK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš ZEMAN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jitka KOČVAROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Martin PAIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Irena DOLEŽALOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Milan BRÁZDIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Seizure-European journal of epilepsy, London, W.B. Saunders Ltd. 2018, 1059-1311.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30210 Clinical neurology
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.765
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104673
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2018.04.022
UT WoS 000437818500009
Keywords in English Epilepsy; Vagus nerve stimulation; Long term follow up; Responder; Battery replacement
Tags 14110127, 14110131, 14119612, podil, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Pavla Foltynová, Ph.D., učo 106624. Changed: 12/3/2019 16:11.
Abstract
Purpose: The paper presents a long-term follow-up study of VNS patients, analyzing seizure outcome, medication changes, and surgical problems. Method: 74 adults with VMS for 10 to 17 years were evaluated yearly as: non-responder - NR (seizure frequency reduction <50%), responder - R (reduction >= 50% and <90%), and 90% responder - 90R (reduction >= 90%). Delayed R or 90R (>= 4 years after surgery), patients with antiepileptic medication changes and battery or complete system replacement were identified. Statistical analysis of potential outcome predictors (age, seizure duration, MRI, seizure type) was performed. Results: The rates of R and 90R related to the patients with outcome data available for the study years 1, 2, 10, and 17 were for R 38.4%, 51.4%, 63.6%, and 77.8%, and for 90R 1.4%, 5.6%, 15.1%, and 11.1%. The absolute numbers of R and 90R increased until years 2 and 6. Antiepileptic therapy was changed in 62 patients (87.9%). There were 11 delayed R and four delayed 90R, with medication changes in the majority. At least one battery replacement was performed in 51 patients (68.9%), 49 of whom R or 90R. VNS system was completely replaced in 7 patients (9.5%) and explanted in 7 NR (9.5%). No significant predictor of VNS outcome was found. Conclusions: After an initial increase, the rate of R and 90R remains stable in long-term follow-up. The changes of antiepileptic treatment in most patients potentially influence the outcome. Battery replacements or malfunctioning system exchange reflect the patient's satisfaction and correlate with good outcomes. (C) 2018 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PrintDisplayed: 25/4/2024 15:20