PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír, Filip MAREK, Lumír KUNOVSKÝ, Roman SVATOŇ, Tomáš GROLICH, Petr MORAVČÍK, Martina FARKAŠOVÁ and Zdeněk KALA. Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND. LONDON: ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, vol. 100, No 7, p. 509-514. ISSN 0035-8843. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning
Authors PROCHÁZKA, Vladimír (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Filip MAREK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lumír KUNOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Roman SVATOŇ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Tomáš GROLICH (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr MORAVČÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Martina FARKAŠOVÁ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution) and Zdeněk KALA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, LONDON, ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND, 2018, 0035-8843.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30212 Surgery
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 1.259
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104706
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0066
UT WoS 000448507400012
Keywords in English Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic stenosis; Oesophageal carcinoma; Minimally invasive oesophagectomy; Stomach ischaemic conditioning
Tags 14110213, 14110223, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 9/2/2019 21:47.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stomach preparation by ischaemic conditioning prior to oesophageal resection represents a potential method of reducing the risk of anastomotic complications. This study compares the results of the anastomotic complications of cervical anastomosis after oesophagectomy with a short interval after ischaemic conditioning (group S) and a long interval (group L). METHODS Subjects undergoing oesophagectomy for carcinoma after ischaemic conditioning were divided into two groups. Group S had a median interval between ischaemic conditioning and resection of 20 days, while for group L the median interval was 49 days. Anastomotic leak and anastomotic stenosis in relation to the interval between ischaemic conditioning and actual resection were followed. RESULTS After ischaemic conditioning, 33 subjects in total underwent surgery for carcinoma; 19 subjects in group S and 14 subjects in group L. Anastomotic leak incidence was comparable in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in 21% of cases in group S and 7% of cases in group L (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION A long interval between ischaemic conditioning and oesophagectomy does not adversely affect the postoperative complications. A lower incidence of anastomosis stenoses was found in subjects with a longer interval, however, given the size of our sample, the statistical significance was not demonstrated. Both groups seem comparable in surgical procedure course and postoperative complications.
PrintDisplayed: 26/4/2024 19:52