KOPEČEK, Lubomír a Miloš BRUNCLÍK. How Strong Is the President in Government Formation? A New Classification and the Czech Case. East European Politics and Societies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, roč. 33, č. 1, s. 109-134. ISSN 0888-3254. doi:10.1177/0888325418770737. 2019.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název How Strong Is the President in Government Formation? A New Classification and the Czech Case
Autoři KOPEČEK, Lubomír (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Miloš BRUNCLÍK (203 Česká republika).
Vydání East European Politics and Societies, Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, 2019, 0888-3254.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW článek v databázi SAGE
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 0.543
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14230/19:00108949
Organizační jednotka Fakulta sociálních studií
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325418770737
UT WoS 000456439100006
Klíčová slova anglicky Czech presidents; formation of governments; Miloš Zeman; Václav Havel; Václav Klaus
Štítky rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Blanka Farkašová, učo 97333. Změněno: 27. 3. 2020 15:04.
Anotace
The article deals with the influence of presidents in the government formation process (GFP). The authors propose an original classification of roles of presidents, reflecting real constitutional practice, with five categories based on real presidential influence on the GFP, from the weakest to the strongest: observer, notary, regulator, co-designer, and creator. This classification is applied to Czechia, where the formal constitution gives the president great opportunities to intervene in the GFP. The results of the analysis of all cases of GFP show a significant variety of roles the Czech presidents have played: from notary to creator. Two factors are particularly important. Firstly, the timing of elections proved significant. When the GFP directly followed parliamentary elections, the presidents were weaker. In contrast, if the GFP followed a government break-up during the electoral term of the Chamber of Deputies, presidents were significantly stronger. Secondly, it depends on the real power of parties, that is, their ability to act together as a cohesive parliamentary majority. In most cases, the presidents showed their resolve to play a greater role than a notary, but they often faced a firm parliamentary majority that actually did not allow them to exert greater influence on the GFP. In contrast, the political proximity between the president and parliamentary parties appears difficult to assess, because there has been the public desire of non-partisan or “above-partisan” presidents in Czechia.
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/0850/2017, interní kód MUNázev: Aktuální problémy politologického výzkumu IV.
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Aktuální problémy politologického výzkumu IV., DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 29. 3. 2024 07:45