PLEVA, Leos, Pavel KUKLA, Jana ZAPLETALOVA and Ota HLINOMAZ. Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, vol. 92, No 6, p. "E416"-"E424", 9 pp. ISSN 1522-1946. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1484319, author = {Pleva, Leos and Kukla, Pavel and Zapletalova, Jana and Hlinomaz, Ota}, article_location = {Hoboken}, article_number = {6}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688}, keywords = {everolimus-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon}, language = {eng}, issn = {1522-1946}, journal = {Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions}, title = {Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study}, volume = {92}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1484319 AU - Pleva, Leos - Kukla, Pavel - Zapletalova, Jana - Hlinomaz, Ota PY - 2018 TI - Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions VL - 92 IS - 6 SP - "E416"-"E424" EP - "E416"-"E424" PB - Wiley-Blackwell SN - 15221946 KW - everolimus-eluting stent KW - in-stent restenosis KW - paclitaxel-eluting balloon N2 - Background The efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) and drug-eluting stents for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis (BMS-ISR) have been demonstrated in several studies with follow-up times of 9 to 12 months; however, the long-term outcomes of ISR treatment are less defined. Objectives Methods We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of PEB and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for the treatment of BMS-ISR. We analyzed 3-year clinical follow-up data from patients included in the TIS randomized clinical study. A total of 136 patients with BMS-ISR were allocated to receive treatment with either PEB or EES (68 patients with 74 ISR lesions per group). Results Conclusions The PEB and EES groups did not significantly differ in major adverse cardiac events-free survival (MACE; P = .211; including individual events: CV death: P = .622; myocardial infarction: P = .650 or target vessel revascularization: P = .286) at 3-year clinical follow-up. No event-free survival differences were found between the groups regarding overall mortality (P = .818), definite stent thrombosis (P = .165) or the second MACE (P = .270). At the 3-year follow-up, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between iopromide-coated PEB and EES for the treatment of BMS-ISR. (; ; NCT01735825). ER -
PLEVA, Leos, Pavel KUKLA, Jana ZAPLETALOVA and Ota HLINOMAZ. Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study. \textit{Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions}. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018, vol.~92, No~6, p.~''E416''-''E424'', 9 pp. ISSN~1522-1946. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27688.
|