C 2020

Arnošt Kolman's Critique of Mathematical Fetishism

MÁCHA, Jakub and Jan ZOUHAR

Basic information

Original name

Arnošt Kolman's Critique of Mathematical Fetishism

Authors

MÁCHA, Jakub (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Jan ZOUHAR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

1. vyd. Cham, Switzerland, The Vienna Circle in Czechoslovakia, p. 135-150, 16 pp. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Vol. 23, 2020

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Field of Study

60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Country of publisher

Switzerland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Publication form

printed version "print"

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14210/20:00115025

Organization unit

Faculty of Arts

ISBN

978-3-030-36382-6

Keywords in English

Arnošt Kolman; Marxism; fetishism; logical positivism; mathematics

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/4/2021 22:57, Ing. Mgr. Zdeňka Jastrzembská, Ph.D.

Abstract

V originále

Arnošt Kolman (1892–1979) was a Czech mathematician, philosopher and Communist official. In this paper, we would like to look at Kolman’s arguments against logical positivism which revolve around the notion of the fetishization of mathematics. Kolman derives his notion of fetishism from Marx’s conception of commodity fetishism. Kolman is aiming to show the fact that an entity (system, structure, logical construction) acquires besides its real existence another formal existence. Fetishism means the fantastic detachment of the physical characteristics of real things or phenomena from these things. We identify Kolman’s two main arguments against logical positivism. In the first argument, Kolman applied Lenin’s arguments against Mach’s empiricism-criticism onto Russell’s neutral monism, i.e. mathematical fetishism is internally related to political conservativism. Kolman’s second main argument is that logical and mathematical fetishes are epistemologically deprived of any historical and dynamic dimension. In the final parts of our paper we place Kolman’s thinking into the context of his time, and furthermore we identify some tenets of mathematical fetishism appearing in Alain Badiou’s mathematical ontology today.

Links

MUNI/A/0878/2019, interní kód MU
Name: Aspekty soudobé filozofie II. (Acronym: Krob)
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A