Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Arnošt Kolman's Critique of Mathematical Fetishism
MÁCHA, Jakub and Jan ZOUHARBasic information
Original name
Arnošt Kolman's Critique of Mathematical Fetishism
Authors
MÁCHA, Jakub (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Jan ZOUHAR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
1. vyd. Cham, Switzerland, The Vienna Circle in Czechoslovakia, p. 135-150, 16 pp. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Vol. 23, 2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Field of Study
60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14210/20:00115025
Organization unit
Faculty of Arts
ISBN
978-3-030-36382-6
Keywords in English
Arnošt Kolman; Marxism; fetishism; logical positivism; mathematics
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/4/2021 22:57, Ing. Mgr. Zdeňka Jastrzembská, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
Arnošt Kolman (1892–1979) was a Czech mathematician, philosopher and Communist official. In this paper, we would like to look at Kolman’s arguments against logical positivism which revolve around the notion of the fetishization of mathematics. Kolman derives his notion of fetishism from Marx’s conception of commodity fetishism. Kolman is aiming to show the fact that an entity (system, structure, logical construction) acquires besides its real existence another formal existence. Fetishism means the fantastic detachment of the physical characteristics of real things or phenomena from these things. We identify Kolman’s two main arguments against logical positivism. In the first argument, Kolman applied Lenin’s arguments against Mach’s empiricism-criticism onto Russell’s neutral monism, i.e. mathematical fetishism is internally related to political conservativism. Kolman’s second main argument is that logical and mathematical fetishes are epistemologically deprived of any historical and dynamic dimension. In the final parts of our paper we place Kolman’s thinking into the context of his time, and furthermore we identify some tenets of mathematical fetishism appearing in Alain Badiou’s mathematical ontology today.
Links
MUNI/A/0878/2019, interní kód MU |
|