Detailed Information on Publication Record
2019
Evaluation of different cerebrospinal fluid and white matter fMRI filtering strategies—Quantifying noise removal and neural signal preservation
BARTOŇ, Marek, Radek MAREČEK, Lenka KRAJČOVIČOVÁ, Tomáš SLAVÍČEK, Tomáš KAŠPÁREK et. al.Basic information
Original name
Evaluation of different cerebrospinal fluid and white matter fMRI filtering strategies—Quantifying noise removal and neural signal preservation
Authors
BARTOŇ, Marek (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Radek MAREČEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lenka KRAJČOVIČOVÁ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Tomáš SLAVÍČEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš KAŠPÁREK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petra HOLŠTAJN ZEMÁNKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Pavel ŘÍHA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Michal MIKL (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Human Brain Mapping, Wiley-Liss, 2019, 1065-9471
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.421
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14740/19:00107257
Organization unit
Central European Institute of Technology
UT WoS
000459470400006
Keywords in English
cerebrospinal fluid; filtering; fMRI; functional connectivity; nuisance regression; principal component analysis; psychophysiological interactions; RETROICOR; white matter
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 24/10/2024 09:40, Mgr. Adéla Pešková
Abstract
V originále
This study examines the impact of using different cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and white matter (WM) nuisance signals for data-driven filtering of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data as a cleanup method before analyzing intrinsic brain fluctuations. The routinely used temporal signal-to-noise ratio metric is inappropriate for assessing fMRI filtering suitability, as it evaluates only the reduction of data variability and does not assess the preservation of signals of interest. We defined a new metric that evaluates the preservation of selected neural signal correlates, and we compared its performance with a recently published signal-noise separation metric. These two methods provided converging evidence of the unfavorable impact of commonly used filtering approaches that exploit higher numbers of principal components from CSF and WM compartments (typically 5 + 5 for CSF and WM, respectively). When using only the principal components as nuisance signals, using a lower number of signals results in a better performance (i.e., 1 + 1 performed best). However, there was evidence that this routinely used approach consisting of 1 + 1 principal components may not be optimal for filtering resting-state (RS) fMRI data, especially when RETROICOR filtering is applied during the data preprocessing. The evaluation of task data indicated the appropriateness of 1 + 1 principal components, but when RETROICOR was applied, there was a change in the optimal filtering strategy. The suggested change for extracting WM (and also CSF in RETROICOR-corrected RS data) is using local signals instead of extracting signals from a large mask using principal component analysis.
Links
EF16_013/0001775, research and development project |
| ||
GA14-33143S, research and development project |
| ||
LM2015062, research and development project |
|