Detailed Information on Publication Record
2018
Ankle-brachial index in diabetic patients - which upper cut-off value is to be used?
HOMZA, M., O. MACHACZKA, M. PORZER, Milan KOZÁK, J. PLASEK et. al.Basic information
Original name
Ankle-brachial index in diabetic patients - which upper cut-off value is to be used?
Authors
HOMZA, M. (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), O. MACHACZKA (203 Czech Republic), M. PORZER (203 Czech Republic), Milan KOZÁK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), J. PLASEK (203 Czech Republic) and D. SIPULA (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
Bratislava Medical Journal - Bratislavské lekárske listy, BRATISLAVA, Univerzita Komenského, 2018, 0006-9248
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher
Slovakia
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 0.859
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00106275
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000457047700011
Keywords in English
ankle-brachial index; diabetes; peripheral arterial disease; lower extremity arterial disease; cut-off
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 21/2/2019 13:21, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
OBJECTIVES: In diabetic patients, there is a discrepancy in guidelines for ankle-brachial index (ABI) screening for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). While diabetes organizations suggest the value of upper limit of normal ABI to be 1.3, cardiologists recommend 1.4. Also, guidelines recommend using the higher value of ankle pressure (HAP) but multiple recent studies propose the opposite (LAP). METHODS: In this prospective study, we performed ABI measurements in 62 diabetic patients. Results were calculated by comparing higher and lower values of ankle pressure to those of duplex ultrasound (stenosis >= 50 % was considered PAD). Special attention was paid to patients with high and non-measurable ABI. RESULTS: LAP ABI appears to be a preferable method for PAD screening in diabetics. The upper cut-off value of 1.4 yielded better results with sensitivity of 93 % and negative predictive value of 91 %. No limbs with ABI between 1.3 and 1.4 with signifi cant stenosis were found. However, using HAP for the upper cut-off captured additional PAD patients. PAD was abundant among patients with high or non-measurable ABI. CONCLUSIONS: LAP should be used for assessing low ABI (cut-off 0.9) while HAP for detecting the abnormally high ABI. The preferable high ABI cut-off is 1.4. Condition with abnormally high or non-measurable ABI should be considered as PAD (Tab. 3, Ref. 22). Text in PDF www. elis. sk.