2019
Safety of urgent endarterectomy in acute non-disabling stroke patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: an international multicenter study
ROUSSOPOULOU, A.; G. TSIVGOULIS; C. KROGIAS; A. LAZARIS; K. MOULAKAKIS et. al.Basic information
Original name
Safety of urgent endarterectomy in acute non-disabling stroke patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: an international multicenter study
Authors
ROUSSOPOULOU, A. (300 Greece); G. TSIVGOULIS (300 Greece, guarantor); C. KROGIAS (276 Germany); A. LAZARIS (300 Greece); K. MOULAKAKIS (300 Greece); G.S. GEORGIADIS (300 Greece); Robert MIKULÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); J.D. KAKISIS (300 Greece); C. ZOMPOLA (300 Greece); S. FAISSNER (300 Greece); M. CHONDROGIANNI (300 Greece); C. LIANTINIOTI (300 Greece); T. HUMMEEL (276 Germany); A. SAFOURIS (300 Greece); P. MATSOT (300 Greece); K. VOUMVOURAKIS (300 Greece); M. LAZARIDES (300 Greece); G. GEROULAKOS (300 Greece) and S.N. VASDEKIS (300 Greece)
Edition
European Journal of Neurology, Oxford, Rapid Science Ltd. 2019, 1351-5101
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30210 Clinical neurology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.516
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00109548
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000460307300020
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85059054181
Keywords in English
carotid; endarterectomy; safety; stroke; TIA; urgent
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 29/4/2019 14:35, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
In the original language
Background and purpose International recommendations advocate that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should be performed within 2 weeks from the index event in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (sCAS) patients. However, there are controversial data regarding the safety of CEA performed during the first 2 days of ictus. The aim of this international, multicenter study was to prospectively evaluate the safety of urgent (0-2 days) in comparison to early (3-14 days) CEA in patients with sCAS. Methods Consecutive patients with non-disabling (modified Rankin Scale scores <= 2) acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack due to sCAS (>= 70%) underwent urgent or early CEA at five tertiary-care stroke centers during a 6-year period. The primary outcome events included stroke, myocardial infarction or death during the 30-day follow-up period. Results A total of 311 patients with sCAS underwent urgent (n = 63) or early (n = 248) CEA. The two groups did not differ in baseline characteristics with the exception of crescendo transient ischaemic attacks (21% in urgent vs. 7% in early CEA; P = 0.001). The 30-day rates of stroke did not differ (P = 0.333) between patients with urgent (7.9%; 95% confidence interval 3.1%-17.7%) and early (4.4%; 95% confidence interval 2.4%-7.9%) CEA. The mortality and myocardial infarction rates were similar between the two groups. The median length of hospitalization was shorter in urgent CEA [6 days (interquartile range 4-6) vs. 10 days (interquartile range 7-14); P Conclusions Our findings highlight that urgent CEA performed within 2 days from the index event is related to a non-significant increase in the risk of peri-procedural stroke. The safety of urgent CEA requires further evaluation in larger datasets.