Detailed Information on Publication Record
2019
Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic
SKULOVÁ, Soňa, Lukáš POTĚŠIL, David HEJČ and Radislav BRAŽINABasic information
Original name
Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic
Authors
SKULOVÁ, Soňa (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lukáš POTĚŠIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), David HEJČ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Radislav BRAŽINA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Central European Public Administration Review, Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, 2019, 2591-2240
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
Slovenia
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/19:00109577
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
UT WoS
000465547300003
Keywords in English
administrative silence; administrative justice; constitutional court; effectiveness; judicial protection
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 13/5/2020 11:13, Mgr. Petr Hudeček
Abstract
V originále
This paper is devoted to the issue of judicial protection in case of (or against) administrative silence (inactivity) and its effectiveness on the case study of the Czech Republic. The aim of judicial protection again-st administrative silence is to help solving or terminating administrati-ve silence quickly, otherwise, an imaginary vicious circle is created. The purpose of the paper is to verify whether judicial protection is indeed effective by surveying the related legislation and court practice (especi-ally the length of proceedings) dealing with the so-called inactivity. The methods of analysis applied are normative analysis, literature review, sta-tistical analysis of decision-making activities of courts and deduction. Our findings establish that due to the excessive length of court proceedings and incomprehensible legal regulation it is difficult to view the judicial protection against administrative silence as being a speedy and effecti-ve instrument of remediation of inactivity on the part of administrative authorities. The results can serve as a ground to compare the situation with other similar countries and to exchange best practices.