J 2019

The legal framework for European cervical cancer screening programmes

MÁJEK, Ondřej, Ahti ANTTILA, Marc ARBYN, Evert Ben VAN VEEN, Birgit ENGESAETER et. al.

Basic information

Original name

The legal framework for European cervical cancer screening programmes

Authors

MÁJEK, Ondřej (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Ahti ANTTILA (246 Finland), Marc ARBYN (56 Belgium), Evert Ben VAN VEEN (528 Netherlands), Birgit ENGESAETER (578 Norway) and Stefan LONNBERG (246 Finland)

Edition

European journal of public health, OXFORD, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2019, 1101-1262

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10103 Statistics and probability

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 2.391

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/19:00109669

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000463809200027

Keywords in English

European cervical cancer screening programmes

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 16/5/2019 14:33, Soňa Böhmová

Abstract

V originále

Background: A comprehensive legal framework needs to be developed to run the health services and to regulate the information systems required to manage and to ensure the quality of cancer screening programmes. The aim of our study was to document and to compare the status of legal basis for cervical screening registration in European countries. Methods: An electronic questionnaire including questions on governance, decision-making structures and legal framework was developed. The primary responses were collected by September 2016. Results: We sent the questionnaire to representatives of 35 European countries (28 countries of the EU, with the United Kingdom included as 4 countries; 4 EFTA member countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland); responses were collected from 33 countries. The legal framework makes it possible to personally invite individuals in 29 countries (88%). Systematic screening registration in an electronic registry is legally enshrined in 23 countries (70%). Individual linkage of records between screening and cancer registries is allowed in 19 of those countries. Linkage studies involving cancer and screening registries have been conducted in 15 countries. Conclusion: Although the majority of EU/EFTA countries have implemented population-based screening, only half of them have successfully performed record linkage studies, which are nevertheless a key recommendation for quality assurance of the entire screening process. The European legislation is open to the possibility of using health data for these purposes; however, member states themselves must recognize the public interest to create a legal basis, which would enable all the necessary functions for high-quality cancer screening programmes.