Detailed Information on Publication Record
2019
Autorská práva, public domain a lidská práva
KOUKAL, PavelBasic information
Original name
Autorská práva, public domain a lidská práva
Name in Czech
Autorská práva, public domain a lidská práva
Name (in English)
Copyright, Public Domain and Human Rights
Authors
KOUKAL, Pavel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Brno, 524 pp. Sciencia, 2019
Publisher
Masarykova univerzita
Other information
Language
Czech
Type of outcome
Odborná kniha
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/19:00107430
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-80-210-9279-2
Keywords (in Czech)
autorské právo; public domain; obecná svoboda jednání; lidská práva; práva vydavatelů
Keywords in English
copyright; public domain; general freedom of action; human rights; rights of press publishers
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 26/3/2020 10:53, Mgr. Petra Georgala
V originále
Kniha se zabývá problematikou autorskoprávně volné složky díla nejen z hlediska jejího postavení v systému soukromého práva, ale také ústavněprávního zakotvení. Autor se nejdříve zaměřuje na autorskoprávně volné prvky díla v kontextu tzv. commons. Na základě Drahosovy a Peukertovy kategorizace commons dospívá k závěru, že existují dvě skupiny společných statků: statky, které „nepatří nikomu“ (negative commons; Gemeingüter), a statky které „patří všem“ (positive commons, Gemeinschaftsgüter/Kollektivgüter). V druhé části práce se autor zabývá jednotlivými ústavními principy, které obecnou svobodu jednání posilují (svoboda projevu), stejně jako principy, které ji naopak omezují (ochrana osobnosti, ochrana majetku, právo na přístup ke kulturnímu bohatství). V dané souvislosti autor dospívá k závěru, že ochrana osobnosti představuje nejsilnější limitaci obecné svobody jednání a může stanovit limity při užívání těch výtvorů, které jsou z autorskoprávního hlediska volné (vědecké myšlenky, teorie, principy, objevy).
In English
This monograph deals with the issue of the non-protected parts of copyrighted works in the view of constitutional law protection. Firstly, the author focuses on the copyright-free elements of the author’s works in the context of the commons. Based on the conclusions of Peter Drahos and Alexander Peukert we can divide the commons into two separate groups: goods which belong to nobody (Gemeinfreiheit, negative commons), and goods which belong to everyone (Gemeinschaftsgüter, positive commons). The author uses Peukert's structural approach to the public domain; especially his division of the public domain into four parts (structural public domain, time-limited public domain, autonomous public domain, and exceptions public domain) and from this perspective analyzes various forms of intangible assets at the national level. In this respect, he pays attention to the constitutional law regulation of intangible assets [Art. 2 (3), Art. 11, Art. 34 (1), (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Czech Republic]. In his book, the author achieves the same conclusions on the copyright-free elements, as we can find in the German jurisprudence. The public domain in the sense of copyright covers non-individual elements such as (i) abstract features (genres, general plots, general types of characters, typical scenes, ideas, chemical or mathematical formulas etc.) or (ii) facts existing objectively (news, facts, elements of nature, historical events, biographical data). On the other hand, other parts of the public domain can be individual per se, but the copyright law does not protect them, due to public interests, technological progress in the software development, or the nature of scientific discourse. In this regard, the public domain also entails (iii) scientific ideas, principles, theories, and discoveries, (iv) ideas and principles underlying computer programs, (v) free works, and (vi) works excluded from copyright protection in the public interest. The last category (works excluded from copyright protection due to the requirements of public interest; Sec. 3 of the Czech Copyright Act) includes two not very cohesive groups of human creations. While official works (laws, governmental regulations, court or administrative decisions) can be considered as collective goods belonging to all (positive inclusive commons), "works of traditional folk culture" are common goods that do not belong to anyone. The author deals with three methodological approaches to the copyright-free elements: the method of balancing competing interests, the method of distinguishing between individualized and non-individualized elements, and notably the method of balancing fundamental rights and freedoms (proportionality test, practical concordance). The author holds the opinion that the use of intangible assets in their natural state is based on the principle of public domain [see also the decision of the EFTA Court in Vigeland case, Municipality of Oslo v. Norwegian Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights (E-5/16)]. Intellectual property rights are only islands of exclusivity in the sea of freedom. In the original state, intangible goods are ubiquitous and non-rival. If there exists no legal prohibition restricting their use, we consider them as goods that everyone can use freely. From the constitutional law perspective, we can regard the general freedom of action (Handlungsfreiheit) as basics of the public domain, which is expressed by a saying: "what is not prohibited by law is allowed" [Art. 2 (3) of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms].
Links
| GA17-19923S, research and development project |
|