ONDRÁČEK, Tomáš. Immunizations as Rules Violations. In 3rd European Conference on Argumentation – ECA 2019. 2019.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Immunizations as Rules Violations
Authors ONDRÁČEK, Tomáš (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition 3rd European Conference on Argumentation – ECA 2019, 2019.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Presentations at conferences
Field of Study 50204 Business and management
Country of publisher Netherlands
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW stránky konference
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14560/19:00110119
Organization unit Faculty of Economics and Administration
Keywords in English immunizing strategies; theory of argumentation; philosophy of science; Popper
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. et Mgr. Tomáš Ondráček, Ph.D., učo 216870. Changed: 9/7/2019 20:22.
Abstract
Boudry and Braeckman (2011) regard immunizing strategies as arguments. I will argue against and show that (A) immunizing strategies are not arguments and (B) they are instead violations of rules of (critical) discussion. I will (A) show problems with analyses of examples using the Toulmin model of argument, and I will (B) show that the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation can explain each type of immunizations as violations of particular rules of critical discussion.
PrintDisplayed: 29/7/2024 03:25