Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’
methodology and current results

J 2019

Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results

KLUGAR, Miloslav, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ, Radim LÍČENÍK, Dana DOLANOVÁ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results

Authors

KLUGAR, Miloslav (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jitka KLUGAROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Andrea POKORNÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Radim LÍČENÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Dana DOLANOVÁ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Jan MUŽÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš NEČAS (203 Czech Republic), Petra BÚŘILOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Martin HUNČOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic) and Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019, 1744-1609

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

Impact factor

Impact factor: 1.930

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/19:00110126

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186

UT WoS

000511111600002

Keywords in English

Clinical Practice Guidelines; evidence transfer; evidence-based health care; GRADE

Abstract

V originále

Currently in the Czech Republic, there does not exist such an institution as a ‘National Centre for Clinical Practice Guidelines’. In 2017, there were about 123 professional medical organizations which developed about 1909 ‘guidelines’ until 2017. However, the majority of these guidelines are ‘expert opinion’ or ‘consensual’ based ‘guidance’ or rather recommendations in the most cases missing a systematic approach that reflects evidence-based medicine principles and methods. The project is led by the Czech Health Research Council, the first partner is theMinistry of Health of the Czech Republic and the second partner is the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic with support from policy makers, academics, clinicians and members of the Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translations. This centre is an umbrella for three very important international collaborations which play a key role in Evidence-Based Healthcare, Evidence Synthesis, Evidence Implementation and trustworthy guidelines development. These are Cochrane Czech Republic, Masaryk University Grade Centre and the Czech Republic Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare: The Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence. The main aim of this article is to present the Czech National Methodology of the Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development and the first results of the project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’. A pilot phase of the project was realized during the first year of the project from January to December 2018. As the first step, there were established managing authorities including a Guarantee Committee and an Appraisal (Methodological) Committee. The Members of the Appraisal Committee developed a pilot version of the National Methodology of CPG development based on the best available approaches to Trustworthy CPGs development followed by testing on the first five pilot CPGs.

Citovat

KLUGAR, Miloslav, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ, Radim LÍČENÍK, Dana DOLANOVÁ, Jan MUŽÍK, Tomáš NEČAS, Petra BÚŘILOVÁ, Martin HUNČOVSKÝ and Ladislav DUŠEK. Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019, vol. 17, Supplement 1, p. „S3“-„S5“, 3 pp. ISSN 1744-1609. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186.

@article{1545118,
   author = {Klugar, Miloslav and Klugarová, Jitka and Pokorná, Andrea and Líčeník, Radim and Dolanová, Dana and Mužík, Jan and Nečas, Tomáš and Búřilová, Petra and Hunčovský, Martin and Dušek, Ladislav},
   article_number = {Supplement 1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186},
   keywords = {Clinical Practice Guidelines; evidence transfer; evidence-based health care; GRADE},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1744-1609},
   journal = {International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare},
   title = {Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186},
   volume = {17},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1545118
AU  - Klugar, Miloslav - Klugarová, Jitka - Pokorná, Andrea - Líčeník, Radim - Dolanová, Dana - Mužík, Jan - Nečas, Tomáš - Búřilová, Petra - Hunčovský, Martin - Dušek, Ladislav
PY  - 2019
TI  - Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results
JF  - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
VL  - 17
IS  - Supplement 1
SP  - „S3“-„S5“
EP  - „S3“-„S5“
PB  - Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
SN  - 17441609
KW  - Clinical Practice Guidelines
KW  - evidence transfer
KW  - evidence-based health care
KW  - GRADE
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186
L2  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186
N2  - Currently in the Czech Republic, there does not exist such an institution as a ‘National Centre for Clinical Practice Guidelines’. In 2017, there were about 123 professional medical organizations which developed about 1909 ‘guidelines’ until 2017. However, the majority of these guidelines are ‘expert opinion’ or ‘consensual’ based ‘guidance’ or rather recommendations in the most cases missing a systematic approach that reflects evidence-based medicine principles and methods. The project is led by the Czech Health Research Council, the first partner is theMinistry of Health of the Czech Republic and the second partner is the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic with support from policy makers, academics, clinicians and members of the Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translations. This centre is an umbrella for three very important international collaborations which play a key role in Evidence-Based Healthcare, Evidence Synthesis, Evidence Implementation and trustworthy guidelines development. These are Cochrane Czech Republic, Masaryk University Grade Centre and the Czech Republic Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare: The Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence. The main aim of this article is to present the Czech National Methodology of the Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development and the first results of the project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’. A pilot phase of the project was realized during the first year of the project from January to December 2018. As the first step, there were established managing authorities including a Guarantee Committee and an Appraisal (Methodological) Committee. The Members of the Appraisal Committee developed a pilot version of the National Methodology of CPG development based on the best available approaches to Trustworthy CPGs development followed by testing on the first five pilot CPGs.
ER  -

KLUGAR, Miloslav, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ, Radim LÍČENÍK, Dana DOLANOVÁ, Jan MUŽÍK, Tomáš NEČAS, Petra BÚŘILOVÁ, Martin HUNČOVSKÝ and Ladislav DUŠEK. Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results. \textit{International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare}. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams \&{} Wilkins, 2019, vol.~17, Supplement 1, p.~„S3“-„S5“, 3 pp. ISSN~1744-1609. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000186.

Detailed Information on Publication Record