Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1545980,
author = {Tolonen, Katri and Picazo, Félix and Vilmi, Annika and Datry, Thibault and Stubbington, Rachel and Pařil, Petr and Rocha, Mariana Perez and Heino, Jani},
article_location = {Hoboken},
article_number = {10},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13373},
keywords = {streams; drying; freezing; intermittence; ecological similarity},
language = {eng},
issn = {0046-5070},
journal = {Freshwater Biology},
title = {Parallels and contrasts between intermittently freezing and drying streams: from individual adaptations to biodiversity variation},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/fwb.13373},
volume = {64},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1545980
AU - Tolonen, Katri - Picazo, Félix - Vilmi, Annika - Datry, Thibault - Stubbington, Rachel - Pařil, Petr - Rocha, Mariana Perez - Heino, Jani
PY - 2019
TI - Parallels and contrasts between intermittently freezing and drying streams: from individual adaptations to biodiversity variation
JF - Freshwater Biology
VL - 64
IS - 10
SP - 1679-1691
EP - 1679-1691
PB - Wiley
SN - 00465070
KW - streams
KW - drying
KW - freezing
KW - intermittence
KW - ecological similarity
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/fwb.13373
L2 - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/fwb.13373
N2 - 1. Intermittently drying and intermittently freezing lotic systems are common in many parts of the world. These ecosystems provide dynamic habitats for biota, as both freezing and drying result in the loss of water flow in stream and river channels. However, despite the commonness of both of these ecosystems, research on the ecological effects of intermittent freezing and drying on stream biota has remained relatively scarce. 2. Climate change is predicted to change the distribution and dynamics of both intermittently freezing and drying stream types. Whereas the occurrence of intermittently drying streams is predicted to increase, the occurrence of intermittently freezing streams is predicted to decrease as a result of the warmer climate. 3. In this review, we compared the effects of both freezing and drying on stream biota, ranging from individual adaptations to population dynamics, community-level biodiversity variation and food webs. 4. We show how, despite the deep contrasts in the abiotic environment, both freezing and drying phenomena have similar pervasive effects on the structure and dynamics of stream biota. 5. We highlight the importance to focus more research on the ecological effects of freezing in stream ecosystems. Deeper understanding of the responses of stream biota to intermittent freezing and drying can help in managing and predicting the effects of climate change on stream ecosystems in the future.
ER -
TOLONEN, Katri, Félix PICAZO, Annika VILMI, Thibault DATRY, Rachel STUBBINGTON, Petr PAŘIL, Mariana Perez ROCHA and Jani HEINO. Parallels and contrasts between intermittently freezing and drying streams: from individual adaptations to biodiversity variation. \textit{Freshwater Biology}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019, vol.~64, No~10, p.~1679-1691. ISSN~0046-5070. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13373.
|
