| GALUŠKOVÁ, Johana and Petr KANIOK. European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda? European Politics and Society. London: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis, 2020, vol. 21, No 4, p. 399-417. ISSN 2374-5118. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1550512,
author = {Galušková, Johana and Kaniok, Petr},
article_location = {London},
article_number = {4},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127},
keywords = {Discursive institutionalism; European communicative discourse; EU coordination systems; centralization; decentralization; Czech Republic},
language = {eng},
issn = {2374-5118},
journal = {European Politics and Society},
title = {European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127},
volume = {21},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1550512
AU - Galušková, Johana - Kaniok, Petr
PY - 2020
TI - European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?
JF - European Politics and Society
VL - 21
IS - 4
SP - 399-417
EP - 399-417
PB - Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis
SN - 23745118
KW - Discursive institutionalism
KW - European communicative discourse
KW - EU coordination systems
KW - centralization
KW - decentralization
KW - Czech Republic
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127
N2 - Coordination systems of the European agenda in EU Member states have been mostly examined thought three traditional neo-institutional approaches. Historical, rational choice and sociological institutional approaches greatly vary in explaining what causes changes in EU affairs coordination structures. We propose that such disagreement is caused by their focus on exogenous static changes, not paying sufficient attention to the role that daily communication of EU affairs may have on the way they are coordinated. Our article fills this gap by analysing the impact of communicative discourse of EU issues in the Czech Republic. Using discursive institutionalism as a point of departure and using critical discursive analysis, we found that the case of a coalition with pro-European discourse did not confirm the expectations about the decentralization of coordination system. On the contrary, the coordination system moved back towards a centralized system.
ER -
GALUŠKOVÁ, Johana and Petr KANIOK. European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda? \textit{European Politics and Society}. London: Routledge Journals, Taylor \&{} Francis, 2020, vol.~21, No~4, p.~399-417. ISSN~2374-5118. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127.
|
