Detailed Information on Publication Record
2019
Brain Morphometry Methods for Feature Extraction in Random Subspace Ensemble Neural Network Classification of First-Episode Schizophrenia
VYŠKOVSKÝ, Roman, Daniel SCHWARZ and Tomáš KAŠPÁREKBasic information
Original name
Brain Morphometry Methods for Feature Extraction in Random Subspace Ensemble Neural Network Classification of First-Episode Schizophrenia
Authors
VYŠKOVSKÝ, Roman (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Daniel SCHWARZ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Tomáš KAŠPÁREK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Neural Computation, CAMBRIDGE, MIT Press, 2019, 0899-7667
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.505
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00108524
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000476941800004
Keywords in English
brain morphometry; schizophrenia; magnetic resonance imaging
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 16/10/2019 14:12, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Machine learning (ML) is a growing field that provides tools for automatic pattern recognition. The neuroimaging community currently tries to take advantage of ML in order to develop an auxiliary diagnostic tool for schizophrenia diagnostics. In this letter, we present a classification framework based on features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data using two automatic whole-brain morphometry methods: voxel-based (VBM) and deformation-based morphometry (DBM). The framework employs a random subspace ensemble-based artificial neural network classifier-in particular, a multilayer perceptron (MLP). The framework was tested on data from first-episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. The experiments differed in terms of feature extraction methods, using VBM, DBM, and a combination of both morphometry methods. Thus, features of different types were available for model adaptation. As we expected, the combination of features increased the MLP classification accuracy up to 73.12%-an improvement of 5% versus MLP-based only on VBM or DBM features. To further verify the findings, other comparisons using support vector machines in place of MLPs were made within the framework. However, it cannot be concluded that any classifier was better than another.
Links
NV17-33136A, research and development project |
|