HANDLOS, Petr, Marek JOUKAL, Marek DOKOUPIL, Matej UVIRA and Klara MARECOVA. Necessary Defense or Homicide? The Importance of Crime Scene Reconstruction in Crossbow Injuries. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019, vol. 40, No 3, p. 293-297. ISSN 0195-7910. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000493.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Necessary Defense or Homicide? The Importance of Crime Scene Reconstruction in Crossbow Injuries
Authors HANDLOS, Petr (203 Czech Republic), Marek JOUKAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Marek DOKOUPIL (203 Czech Republic), Matej UVIRA (203 Czech Republic) and Klara MARECOVA (guarantor).
Edition American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019, 0195-7910.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30501 Forensic science
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 0.785
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/19:00111108
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000493
UT WoS 000482402100019
Keywords in English forensic science; forensic pathology; crime scene reconstruction; crossbow; homicide; ballistic
Tags 14110514, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 31/10/2019 13:33.
Abstract
Reconstruction of a criminal offense is a crucial approach in forensics and criminalistics allowing for the verification of the location, the particular method used, or the use of a specific instrument. This report describes the case of a young man who was killed by an arrow shot from a crossbow. The autopsy revealed a penetration of the head and significant damage to the brain stem. Although the cause of death was evident from the outset, it was necessary to clarify whether or not the arrow was shot as necessary self-defense. Ballistic investigation of the seized weapon and reconstruction of the crime was absolutely essential to bring forth conclusive evidence to convict the perpetrators of the murder.
PrintDisplayed: 2/5/2024 03:01