ŠVEC, Martin and Nikola SCHMIDT. Dilemmas for Planetary Defense Posed by the Current International Law Framework. In Nikola Schmidt. Planetary Defense Global Collaboration for Defending Earth from Asteroids and Comets. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, p. 245-260. Space and Society. ISBN 978-3-030-00999-1. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01000-3_16.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Dilemmas for Planetary Defense Posed by the Current International Law Framework
Authors ŠVEC, Martin (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Nikola SCHMIDT (203 Czech Republic).
Edition 1. vyd. Cham, Planetary Defense Global Collaboration for Defending Earth from Asteroids and Comets, p. 245-260, 16 pp. Space and Society, 2019.
Publisher Springer International Publishing
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Chapter(s) of a specialized book
Field of Study 50501 Law
Country of publisher Switzerland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
WWW Web nakladatele
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/19:00111132
Organization unit Faculty of Law
ISBN 978-3-030-00999-1
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01000-3_16
Keywords (in Czech) Planetární obrana Mezinárodní vesmírné právo
Keywords in English Planetary defense International space law Asteroid
Tags rivok, topvydavatel
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 12/5/2020 20:42.
Abstract
We have not dedicated substantial space to international law in this book, however, we could not omit the topic entirely while writing about planetary defense in a multidisciplinary manner. The planetary defense endeavor is clearly dependent on more than just one aspect of knowledge. Astronomers can tell us where asteroids are, engi- neers can design machines to deflect them and political scientists can imagine the best governance structures for achieving public support, but it is international law that tells us where we stand now, and what is or is not possible to do if a threat even- tuates tomorrow. The point of international law, for example in the case of nuclear mitigation methods, is to tell us whether it is even worth studying them since, according to international treaties, we will never get the chance to test them in space. Can we use the traditional collective security measures in the case of an asteroid threat? Is the Security Council the right body to decide? Does an asteroid threat constitute a challenge to the concept of global ‘peace and security’? Should states have the right to use the provision of self-defense to legitimize unilateral action against an asteroid? Is a multilateral action necessarily legitimate if some states do not agree? These and many other dilemmas are discussed.
PrintDisplayed: 25/4/2024 15:35