Detailed Information on Publication Record

MORARU, Madalina Bianca, Galina CORNELISSE and Philippe DE BRUYCKER. Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union. 1st ed. Hart Publishing, 2020, 528 pp. Modern Studies in European Law. ISBN 978-1-5099-2296-3.

Other formats: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

TY  - BOOK
ID  - 1581937
AU  - Moraru, Madalina Bianca - Cornelisse, Galina - de Bruycker, Philippe
PY  - 2020
TI  - Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union
VL  - Modern Studies in European Law
PB  - Hart Publishing
SN  - 9781509922963
KW  - Irregular migration
KW  - judicial dialogue
KW  - fundamental rights
KW  - return directive
KW  - CJEU
KW  - ECtHR
UR  - https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/law-and-judicial-dialogue-on-the-return-of-irregular-migrants-from-the-european-union-9781509943470/
N2  - This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.
ER  -

Basic information
Original name	Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union
Authors	MORARU, Madalina Bianca, Galina CORNELISSE and Philippe DE BRUYCKER.
Edition	1. vyd. 528 pp. Modern Studies in European Law, 2020.
Publisher	Hart Publishing

Other information
Original language	English
Type of outcome	Book on a specialized topic
Field of Study	50501 Law
Country of publisher	United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree	is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form	printed version "print"
WWW	Web nakladatele
Organization unit	Faculty of Law
ISBN	978-1-5099-2296-3
Keywords in English	Irregular migration; judicial dialogue; fundamental rights; return directive; CJEU; ECtHR
Tags	topvydavatel
Changed by	Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 16/6/2022 14:09.

Abstract
This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.

Abstract

This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.