Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@proceedings{1589942,
author = {Machura, Jakub and Geržová, Helena and Masopustová, Markéta and Valíčková, Marie},
booktitle = {Thirteen Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2019},
keywords = {syntactic analysis;SET;grammar checker;punctuation;comma;homonymy;grammatical agreement;subject-predicate agreement;colloquial expressions;zeugma},
language = {eng},
title = {Comparing majka and MorphoDiTa for Automatic Grammar Checking},
year = {2019}
}
TY - CONF
ID - 1589942
AU - Machura, Jakub - Geržová, Helena - Masopustová, Markéta - Valíčková, Marie
PY - 2019
TI - Comparing majka and MorphoDiTa for Automatic Grammar Checking
KW - syntactic analysis;SET;grammar checker;punctuation;comma;homonymy;grammatical agreement;subject-predicate agreement;colloquial expressions;zeugma
N2 - Developing a grammar checker requires the most accurate morphological analysis. We have been using the majka analyzer and DESAMB tagger so far, but due to certain obstacles to disambiguation, we encountered many errors in morphological analysis. Nowadays, there are several tools that achieve comparable results. Therefore, it was beneficial to test the one which is well-kept and open-source – the MorphoDiTa system. For the detection of grammatical, stylistic and punctuation errors we use mainly special grammars built into the SET parser and this paper presents results based on outputs of both morphological analyzers.
ER -
MACHURA, Jakub, Helena GERŽOVÁ, Markéta MASOPUSTOVÁ and Marie VALÍČKOVÁ. Comparing majka and MorphoDiTa for Automatic Grammar Checking. In \textit{Thirteen Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2019}. 2019.
|
