Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1591059, author = {Bělohrad, Radim}, article_number = {4}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y}, keywords = {deception; intention; manipulation; ulterior motive}, language = {eng}, issn = {0353-5150}, journal = {Acta Analytica}, title = {The Nature and Moral Status of Manipulation}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y}, volume = {34}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1591059 AU - Bělohrad, Radim PY - 2019 TI - The Nature and Moral Status of Manipulation JF - Acta Analytica VL - 34 IS - 4 SP - 447-462 EP - 447-462 SN - 03535150 KW - deception KW - intention KW - manipulation KW - ulterior motive UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y L2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y N2 - The paper focuses on the nature and moral status of manipulation. I analyse a popular account of manipulation by Robert Noggle and assess a challenge that has been posed by Moti Gorin. I argue that Noggle’s theory can fend off the challenge. The analysis is instructive in that it enables one to look more closely at the nature of manipulation. I argue, contrary to some proposed accounts, that manipulation essentially involves deception about the manipulator’s intentions. Secondly, since manipulation contains an element of deception, it is, I maintain, prima facie immoral. Finally, I analyse and explain away several examples of allegedly morally non-problematic manipulation. ER -
BĚLOHRAD, Radim. The Nature and Moral Status of Manipulation. \textit{Acta Analytica}. 2019, vol.~34, No~4, p.~447-462. ISSN~0353-5150. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y.
|