BĚLOHRAD, Radim. The Nature and Moral Status of Manipulation. Acta Analytica. 2019, vol. 34, No 4, p. 447-462. ISSN 0353-5150. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The Nature and Moral Status of Manipulation
Authors BĚLOHRAD, Radim (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Acta Analytica, 2019, 0353-5150.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60302 Ethics
Country of publisher Germany
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/19:00111659
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00407-y
UT WoS 000495764700004
Keywords in English deception; intention; manipulation; ulterior motive
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Ing. Mgr. Zdeňka Jastrzembská, Ph.D., učo 11408. Changed: 20/3/2020 14:45.
Abstract
The paper focuses on the nature and moral status of manipulation. I analyse a popular account of manipulation by Robert Noggle and assess a challenge that has been posed by Moti Gorin. I argue that Noggle’s theory can fend off the challenge. The analysis is instructive in that it enables one to look more closely at the nature of manipulation. I argue, contrary to some proposed accounts, that manipulation essentially involves deception about the manipulator’s intentions. Secondly, since manipulation contains an element of deception, it is, I maintain, prima facie immoral. Finally, I analyse and explain away several examples of allegedly morally non-problematic manipulation.
Links
MUNI/A/0945/2018, interní kód MUName: Aspekty soudobé filozofie I. (Acronym: Krob)
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 29/7/2024 03:25