Detailed Information on Publication Record
2019
Methodology of a Novel Risk Stratification Algorithm for Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Relapsed Setting
BOUWMEESTER, Walter, Andrew BRIGGS, Ben VAN HOUT, Roman HAJEK, Sebastian GONZALEZ-MCQUIRE et. al.Basic information
Original name
Methodology of a Novel Risk Stratification Algorithm for Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Relapsed Setting
Authors
BOUWMEESTER, Walter (528 Netherlands, guarantor), Andrew BRIGGS (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Ben VAN HOUT (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Roman HAJEK (203 Czech Republic), Sebastian GONZALEZ-MCQUIRE (756 Switzerland), Marco CAMPIONI (756 Switzerland), Lucy DECOSTA (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) and Lucie BROŽOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2019, 2366-1070
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30204 Oncology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00111947
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000493779800001
Keywords in English
Algorithm; Multiple myeloma; Prognostic model; Risk; Survival
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 16/1/2020 15:02, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Introduction Risk stratification tools provide valuable information to inform treatment decisions. Existing algorithms for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were based on patients with newly diagnosed disease, and these have not been validated in the relapsed setting or in routine clinical practice. We developed a risk stratification algorithm (RSA) for patients with MM at initiation of second-line (2L) treatment, based on data from the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies. Methods Predictors of overall survival (OS) at 2L treatment were identified using Cox proportional hazards models and backward selection. Risk scores were obtained by multiplying the hazard ratios for each predictor. The K-adaptive partitioning for survival (KAPS) algorithm defined four groups of stratification based on individual risk scores. Results Performance of the RSA was assessed using Nagelkerke's R-2 test and Harrell's concordance index through Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS data. Prognostic groups were successfully defined based on real-world data. Use of a multiplicative score based on Cox modeling and KAPS to define cut-off values was effective. Conclusion Through innovative methods of risk assessment and collaboration between physicians and statisticians, the RSA was capable of stratifying patients at 2L treatment by survival expectations. This approach can be used to develop clinical decision-making tools in other disease areas to improve patient management. Funding Amgen Europe GmbH.