Informační systém MU
MILOTA, Tomas, Marketa BLOOMFIELD, Pavlina KRALICKOVA, Dalibor JILEK, Vitezslav NOVAK, Jiří LITZMAN, Helena POSOVA, Lucie MRAZOVA, Jana POLONIOVA, Miroslav PRUCHA, Pavel ROZSIVAL, Vlasta RAUSCHOVA, Gunnar PHILIPP and Anna SEDIVA. Czech Hizentra Noninterventional Study With Rapid Push: Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Convenience of Therapy With 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin. Clinical Therapeutics. BRIDGEWATER: Elsevier, 2019, vol. 41, No 11, p. 2231-2238. ISSN 0149-2918. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.08.013.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Czech Hizentra Noninterventional Study With Rapid Push: Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Convenience of Therapy With 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin
Authors MILOTA, Tomas (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Marketa BLOOMFIELD (203 Czech Republic), Pavlina KRALICKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Dalibor JILEK (203 Czech Republic), Vitezslav NOVAK (203 Czech Republic), Jiří LITZMAN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Helena POSOVA (203 Czech Republic), Lucie MRAZOVA (203 Czech Republic), Jana POLONIOVA (203 Czech Republic), Miroslav PRUCHA (203 Czech Republic), Pavel ROZSIVAL (203 Czech Republic), Vlasta RAUSCHOVA (203 Czech Republic), Gunnar PHILIPP (203 Czech Republic) and Anna SEDIVA (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Clinical Therapeutics, BRIDGEWATER, Elsevier, 2019, 0149-2918.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30104 Pharmacology and pharmacy
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.119
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112432
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.08.013
UT WoS 000503107700004
Keywords in English Nonmedical switch; Primary antibody deficiency; Rapid push; Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy; Treatment satisfaction
Tags 14110114, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 16/1/2020 07:22.
Abstract
Purpose: Immunoglobulin substitution therapy is an essential therapeutic approach for patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Different methods of administration, including intravenous immunoglobulin (WIG) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) preparations, provide effective and tolerable treatment and enable the adjustment of therapy to patients' needs. A new 20% SCIG represents a new therapeutic option and a new route of administration using rapid-push application. The aim of the Czech Hizentra Noninterventional Study With Rapid Push (CHHINSTRAP) is to evaluate patient satisfaction with as well as the tolerability and efficacy of nonmedical switch to 20% SCIG from previous treatment with WIG or SCIG and rapid push as a new way to administer SCIG. CHHINSTRAP is the first Phase W, noninterventional, open-label, prospective, multicentric study of this type conducted in Central and Eastern Europe. Methods: Primary end points, including efficacy, adverse effects, convenience of use, and overall satisfaction, were evaluated by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II. Secondary end points, such as serum IgG trough levels, infusion duration, number of application sites, frequency of infections, related hospital admissions, and antibiotic consumption, were obtained from patients at each follow-up visit. Findings: Together, 50 eligible patients with primary antibody deficiency were switched from SCIG or WIG to an equivalent dose of 20% SCIG and were followed up for 12 months during 5 consecutive visits. The results indicate that patients switched from previous WIG or SCIG preparations had significantly higher serum trough IgG levels and a lower incidence of infections and related events, such as hospital admissions or consumption of antibiotics. These findings were also reflected in gradually increasing convenience of use and overall satisfaction reported by patients. Apart from duration of application, no differences were found between patients previously receiving SCIG or WIG. Moreover, our study found a high level of safety of 20% SCIG rapid push, which was comparable to other preparations and application methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Displayed: 20/7/2024 10:28