Detailed Information on Publication Record
2019
European “Judicial Monologue” of the Czech Constitutional Court – a Critical Review of its approach to the Preliminary Ruling Procedure
SEHNÁLEK, David and Václav STEHLÍKBasic information
Original name
European “Judicial Monologue” of the Czech Constitutional Court – a Critical Review of its approach to the Preliminary Ruling Procedure
Authors
SEHNÁLEK, David (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Václav STEHLÍK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
International and Comparative Law Review, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, 2019, 1213-8770
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/19:00115215
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
Keywords in English
Czech courts; Czech Constitutional Court; Court of Justice of the European Union; preliminary ruling procedure; judicial dialog; European constitutionalism.
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/5/2021 16:52, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Abstract
V originále
The paper analyses the use of the preliminary ruling procedure by the Czech Constitutional Court and the attitude of this court towards the EU law. The approach of the Constitutional Court to the judicial dialog is also compared with some other European constitutional courts mainly with those who have a similar role in national judiciary or with those who were able to effectively take an advantage of the preliminary ruling procedure. The paper demonstrates that the Czech Constitutional Court took the position that seems to be unsustainable from a long time perspective as the reality of the current development favours the spirit of cooperation among European highest courts.