SALLES, Gilles, Emmanuel BACHY, Lukáš SMOLEJ, Martin SIMKOVIC, Lucile BASEGGIO, Anna PANOVSKÁ, Herve BESSON, Nollaig HEALY, Jamie GARSIDE, Wafae IRAQI, Joris DIELS, Corinna PICK-LAUER, Martin SPACEK, Renata URBANOVA, Daniel LYSAK, Ruben HERMANS, Jessica LUNDBOM, Evelyne CALLET-BAUCHU and Michael DOUBEK. Single-agent ibrutinib in RESONATE-2 (TM) and RESONATE (TM) versus treatments in the real-world PHEDRA databases for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Annals of hematology. New York: Springer Verlag, 2019, vol. 98, No 12, p. 2749-2760. ISSN 0939-5555. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03830-8.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Single-agent ibrutinib in RESONATE-2 (TM) and RESONATE (TM) versus treatments in the real-world PHEDRA databases for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Authors SALLES, Gilles (250 France, guarantor), Emmanuel BACHY (250 France), Lukáš SMOLEJ (203 Czech Republic), Martin SIMKOVIC (203 Czech Republic), Lucile BASEGGIO (250 France), Anna PANOVSKÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Herve BESSON (372 Ireland), Nollaig HEALY (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Jamie GARSIDE (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Wafae IRAQI (250 France), Joris DIELS (56 Belgium), Corinna PICK-LAUER (276 Germany), Martin SPACEK (203 Czech Republic), Renata URBANOVA (203 Czech Republic), Daniel LYSAK, Ruben HERMANS (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Jessica LUNDBOM (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Evelyne CALLET-BAUCHU (250 France) and Michael DOUBEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Annals of hematology, New York, Springer Verlag, 2019, 0939-5555.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30205 Hematology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.904
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112598
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03830-8
UT WoS 000497186800001
Keywords in English Ibrutinib; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Real-world evidence; Randomized controlled trial; Progression-free survival; Overall survival
Tags 14110212, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Pavla Foltynová, Ph.D., učo 106624. Changed: 31/3/2020 22:16.
Abstract
After analyzing treatment patterns in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (objective 1), we investigated the relative effectiveness of ibrutinib versus other commonly used treatments (objective 2) in patients with treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory CLL, comparing patient-level data from two randomized registration trials with two real-world databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. Rituximab-containing regimens were often prescribed in clinical practice. The most frequently prescribed regimens were fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 29.3%), bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 17.7%), and other rituximab-containing regimens (22.0%) in the treatment-naive setting (n = 604), other non-FCR/BR rituximab-containing regimens (38.7%) and non-rituximab-containing regimens (28.5%) in the relapsed/refractory setting (n = 945). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, with ibrutinib versus real-world regimens were 0.23 (0.14-0.37; p < 0.0001) and 0.40 (0.22-0.76; p = 0.0048) in the treatment-naive setting, and 0.21 (0.16-0.27; p < 0.0001) and 0.29 (0.21-0.41; p < 0.0001) in the relapsed/refractory setting. When comparing real-world use of ibrutinib (n = 53) versus other real-world regimens in relapsed/refractory CLL (objective 3), adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 0.37 (0.22-0.63; p = 0.0003) for PFS and 0.53 (0.27-1.03; p < 0.0624) for OS. This adjusted analysis, based on nonrandomized patient data, suggests ibrutinib to be more effective than other commonly used regimens for CLL.
PrintDisplayed: 28/7/2024 00:34