J 2019

Is Computer-Assisted Aminoglycoside Dosing Managed by a Pharmacist a Safety Tool of Pharmacotherapy?

DVORACKOVA, E., P. PAVEK, B. KOVACOVA, Jitka RYCHLÍČKOVÁ, O. SUCHOPAR et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Is Computer-Assisted Aminoglycoside Dosing Managed by a Pharmacist a Safety Tool of Pharmacotherapy?

Authors

DVORACKOVA, E. (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), P. PAVEK (203 Czech Republic), B. KOVACOVA (203 Czech Republic), Jitka RYCHLÍČKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), O. SUCHOPAR (203 Czech Republic), M. HOJNY (203 Czech Republic), J. D. TEBBENS (203 Czech Republic) and J. VLCEK (203 Czech Republic)

Edition

Physiological research, Praha, Fyziologický ústav AV ČR, 2019, 0862-8408

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30105 Physiology

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 1.655

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112619

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000499085100010

Keywords in English

Therapeutic drug monitoring; Aminoglycosides; Pharmacist; Nephrotoxicity; Pharmacokinetics

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/5/2020 10:44, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

This pilot prospective study verified the hypothesis that use of computer-assisted therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides by pharmacists leads to better safety therapeutic outcomes and cost avoidance than only concentration measurement and dose adjustments based on a physician's experience. Two groups of patients were enrolled according to the technique of monitoring. Patients (Group 1, n=52) underwent monitoring by a pharmacist using pharmacokinetic software. In a control group (Group 2, n=11), plasma levels were measured but not interpreted by the pharmacist, only by physicians. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in factors influenced by therapy. However, the results are not statistically significant but a comparison of the groups showed a clear trend towards safety and cost avoidance, thus supporting therapeutic drug monitoring. Safety limits were achieved in 76 % and 63 % of cases in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. More patients achieved both concentrations (peak and trough) with falling eGFR in Group 1. In present pilot study, the pharmacist improved the care of patients on aminoglycoside therapy. A larger study is needed to demonstrate statistically significantly improved safety and cost avoidance of aminoglycoside therapy monitoring by the pharmacist using pharmacokinetic software.