Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1608280,
author = {Vít, Michal and Houdek, Miloslav and Sebera, Martin},
article_location = {Czestochowa},
article_number = {1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.16926/par.2019.07.23},
keywords = {response time; stress; self-defence; police; law enforcement training; shooting},
language = {eng},
issn = {2300-5076},
journal = {Physical Activity Review},
title = {Reaction time and stress tolerance of police officers in specific and non-specific tests in professional self-defence training},
url = {http://www.physactiv.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019_23.pdf},
volume = {7},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1608280
AU - Vít, Michal - Houdek, Miloslav - Sebera, Martin
PY - 2019
TI - Reaction time and stress tolerance of police officers in specific and non-specific tests in professional self-defence training
JF - Physical Activity Review
VL - 7
IS - 1
SP - 193-200
EP - 193-200
PB - PPHU Projack
SN - 23005076
KW - response time
KW - stress
KW - self-defence
KW - police
KW - law enforcement training
KW - shooting
UR - http://www.physactiv.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019_23.pdf
L2 - http://www.physactiv.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019_23.pdf
N2 - Introduction: The police forces performance is demanding on well-timed and quick reaction. Single reaction time and choice reaction time are crucial when the jeopardy appears. Performing under stress in life-threatening situations needs a good level of stress tolerance. In our study, we used two nonspecific, and two specific (shooting) tests to analyse the reactivity of police officer under different conditions. Material and methods: The research sample consisted of n=18 male Czech police training instructors. The group is unique as these police officers are specialised in the professional self-defence with focus on the coercive means use and shooting skills. Two standardized non-specific tests administrated with the Vienna Test System (VTS) by Schuhfried GmbH were used for data gathering. Single reaction time (SRT) was measured by the Reaction test, stress tolerance and choice reaction time (CRT) was measured by the Determination test. Two practical non-standardized shooting tests were used for the reactivity analysis in the goal oriented environment (shooting range). Results: The single reaction time among police training instructors was M=261.56±33.60 ms, which corresponds to the 66.28 percentile of age norm. Performance in the stress tolerance test also matches the average performance in population (M=45.56 percentile of correct reactions, M=61.67 percentile of incorrect reactions, M=51.44 percentile of skipped signals). According to the Pearson correlation coefficient, there is no correlation between single reaction time in the Reaction test and choice reaction time in the Determination test (r=-0.03). There is no correlation between single reaction time in the nonspecific Reaction test and performance in the specific Shooting test 1 (r=0.06) and Shooting test 2 (r=-0.01). Conclusions: There is no relation between the results in the specific and non-specific reaction tests. Nonspecific tests of single reaction time and choice reaction time are suitable for a general assessment of motor abilities. Specific tasks need specific training and specific evaluation methods.
ER -
VÍT, Michal, Miloslav HOUDEK and Martin SEBERA. Reaction time and stress tolerance of police officers in specific and non-specific tests in professional self-defence training. \textit{Physical Activity Review}. Czestochowa: PPHU Projack, 2019, vol.~7, No~1, p.~193-200. ISSN~2300-5076. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.16926/par.2019.07.23.
|
