Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1609856, author = {Bártová, Eva and Kučerová, Hana Lya and Žákovská, Alena and Budíková, Marie and Nejezchlebová, Helena}, article_location = {Jena}, article_number = {2}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101350}, keywords = {Apodemus; Myodes; Q fever; Serology; Tularemia}, language = {eng}, issn = {1877-959X}, journal = {Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases}, title = {Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis in wild small mammals from the Czech Republic}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X1930072X?via%3Dihub}, volume = {11}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1609856 AU - Bártová, Eva - Kučerová, Hana Lya - Žákovská, Alena - Budíková, Marie - Nejezchlebová, Helena PY - 2020 TI - Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis in wild small mammals from the Czech Republic JF - Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases VL - 11 IS - 2 SP - 101350 EP - 101350 PB - Elsevier GmbH SN - 1877959X KW - Apodemus KW - Myodes KW - Q fever KW - Serology KW - Tularemia UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X1930072X?via%3Dihub L2 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X1930072X?via%3Dihub N2 - Wild rodents are an important source of the tick-borne pathogens Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of antibodies and possible coexistence of these pathogens in wild small mammals from three localities in the Czech Republic. A total of 614 wild small mammals (324 Apodemus flavicollis, 145 Myodes glareolus, 50 Sorex araneus, 48 A. sylvaticus, 40 A. agrarius, six Microtus arvalis and one Talpa europaea) were trapped between 2012 and 2015. Their sera or heart extracts were examined by modified indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, with the detection of antibodies against C. burnetii and F. tularensis in 12of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii and F. tularensis antibodies statistically differed according to animal species and sex (p < 0.05); the seroprevalence of C. burnetii should be together in one line ] burnetii (p < 0.05) also differed in the sampling period. The highest prevalence of antibodies against C. burnetii and F. tularensis was detected in the case of M. glareolus (24% and 14 % and 14 %, respectively). ER -
BÁRTOVÁ, Eva, Hana Lya KUČEROVÁ, Alena ŽÁKOVSKÁ, Marie BUDÍKOVÁ and Helena NEJEZCHLEBOVÁ. Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis in wild small mammals from the Czech Republic. \textit{Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases}. Jena: Elsevier GmbH, 2020, vol.~11, No~2, p.~101350-101353. ISSN~1877-959X. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101350.
|