Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1627417,
author = {Caha, Pavel and Taraldsen Medová, Lucie},
article_number = {1-2},
keywords = {Nanosyntax; passive; syncretism},
language = {eng},
issn = {0027-8203},
journal = {Naše řeč},
title = {Syncretism in Nanosyntax and three types of passive participles in Czech},
url = {http://nase-rec.ujc.cas.cz/archiv.php?art=8571},
volume = {103},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1627417
AU - Caha, Pavel - Taraldsen Medová, Lucie
PY - 2020
TI - Syncretism in Nanosyntax and three types of passive participles in Czech
JF - Naše řeč
VL - 103
IS - 1-2
SP - 113-130
EP - 113-130
PB - AV ČR, Ústav pro jazyk český
SN - 00278203
KW - Nanosyntax
KW - passive
KW - syncretism
UR - http://nase-rec.ujc.cas.cz/archiv.php?art=8571
N2 - Nanosyntax is a relatively new framework of linguistic analysis that originates in the work by Starke (2009; 2018). In this article, we focus on the framework’s ability to deal with syncretism. To have a specific case to work with, we analyze passive participles in Czech. Building on Kratzer’s (2000) work, we introduce a three-way ambiguity of the Czech passive participle. The first distinc- tion we make is between stative (adjectival) and eventive (verbal) passives. The second distinction applies within the set of stative participles and divides them into Target-state participles and Re- sultant-state participles. The latter describe states that hold as a result of some prior event taking place. Target-state participles entail no prior event. The result is a situation where we have three distinct meanings and just a single form (namely the passive participle), which is a situation that is usually covered by the term syncretism. In the last part, we describe how such a three-way ambiguity can be captured in Nanosyntax.
ER -
CAHA, Pavel and Lucie TARALDSEN MEDOVÁ. Syncretism in Nanosyntax and three types of passive participles in Czech. \textit{Naše řeč}. AV ČR, Ústav pro jazyk český, 2020, vol.~103, 1-2, p.~113-130. ISSN~0027-8203.
|
