Detailed Information on Publication Record
2016
High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report
JANDOVÁ, Monika, Zdeněk TOMEŠ and Christopher Alfred NASHBasic information
Original name
High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report
Authors
JANDOVÁ, Monika (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Zdeněk TOMEŠ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Christopher Alfred NASH (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
Edition
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, DE GRUYTER OPEN LTD, BOGUMILA ZUGA 32A ST, 01-811 WARSAW, POLAND, 2016, 1213-2446
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50202 Applied Economics, Econometrics
Country of publisher
Poland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14560/16:00113834
Organization unit
Faculty of Economics and Administration
UT WoS
000406945000006
Keywords in English
Central and Eastern Europe; demand forecast; ex-ante evaluations; economic geography; high-speed rail
Změněno: 11/5/2020 10:21, Mgr. Daniela Marcollová
Abstract
V originále
The European transport strategy promotes the role of railways and expects that the key role in passenger transport should be played by high-speed rail (HSR). Although the core network of high-speed lines has already been built and is operating in Western Europe, there has been little coverage so far in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The aim of the conference " High-Speed Rail for CEE Countries" that took place in Prague in June 2016 was to put together academics, policy-makers, and practitioners interested in HSR and to formulate recommendations for CEE countries based on West European countries' experience. Based on the conference presentations and subsequent discussion, the following conclusions were formulated. Firstly, there are many crucial differences in national HSR build-up and operation, which means that former experience of Western Europe is not directly applicable to CEE countries. Secondly, in comparing presentations discussing experiences in France, Britain, Italy, and Germany, it was concluded that the German approach-upgrading existing lines where possible and only building new lines for bottleneck sections-was the most likely appropriate solution in CEE. Lastly, CEE has the additional problem of many border crossings, with a reduction of traffic in comparison with purely domestic routes, and this effect has to be taken into account.