Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Machine learning volumetry of ischemic brain lesions on CT after thrombectomy-prospective diagnostic accuracy study in ischemic stroke patients
KRÁL, Jiří, Martin CABAL, Linda MACHOVÁ, Jaroslav HAVELKA, Tomáš JONSZTA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Machine learning volumetry of ischemic brain lesions on CT after thrombectomy-prospective diagnostic accuracy study in ischemic stroke patients
Authors
KRÁL, Jiří (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Martin CABAL (203 Czech Republic), Linda MACHOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Jaroslav HAVELKA (203 Czech Republic), Tomáš JONSZTA, Ondřej VOLNÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Michal BAR (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
NEURORADIOLOGY, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2020, 0028-3940
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.804
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115700
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000528133300001
Keywords in English
Computed tomography; Software; Automatic; Final ischemia
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 13/9/2021 14:59, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Purpose Ischemic lesion volume (ILV) is an important radiological predictor of functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation stroke. Our aim was to assess the agreement between automated ILV measurements on NCCT using the Brainomix software and manual ILV measurements on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods This was a prospective single-center observational study of patients with CT angiography (CTA) proven anterior circulation occlusion treated with endovascular thrombectomy (May 2018 to May 2019). NCCT ILV was measured automatically by the Brainomix software. DWI ILV was measured manually. The McNemar's test was used to test sensitivity and specificity. The Somer's delta was used to test the differences between concordant and discordant ASPECTS regions. The Bland-Altman plot was calculated to compare the differences between Brainomix and DWI ILVs. Results Forty-five patients were included. Median Brainomix ILV was 23 ml (interquartile range [IQR], 15-39 ml), and median DWI ILV was 11.5 ml (IQR, 7-32 ml) in the TICI 2b-3 group. In the TICI 0-2a, the NCCT ILV was 39 ml (IQR, 18-62 ml) and DWI ILV was 30 (IQR, 11-105 ml). The DWI ILVs in patients with good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) was significantly lower compared with patients with mRS >= 3 (10 mL vs 59 mL, p = 0.002). Similar trend was observed for Brainomix ILV measurements (21 mL vs 39 mL, p = 0.012). There was a high correlation and accuracy in the detection of follow-up ischemic changes in particular ASPECTS regions. Conclusion NCCT ILV measured automatically by the Brainomix software might be considered a valuable radiological outcome measure.