Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Comparison of different methods of thrombus permeability measurement and impact on recanalization in the INTERRSeCT multinational multicenter prospective cohort study
GENSICKE, H., J. W. EVANS, F. S. AL AJLAN, D. DOWLATSHAHI, M. NAJM et. al.Basic information
Original name
Comparison of different methods of thrombus permeability measurement and impact on recanalization in the INTERRSeCT multinational multicenter prospective cohort study
Authors
GENSICKE, H. (124 Canada, guarantor), J. W. EVANS (124 Canada), F. S. AL AJLAN (124 Canada), D. DOWLATSHAHI (124 Canada), M. NAJM (124 Canada), A. L. CALLEJA (724 Spain), J. PUIG (724 Spain), S .L. SOHN (410 Republic of Korea), S. H. AHN (410 Republic of Korea), A. Y. POPPE (124 Canada), Robert MIKULÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), N. ASDAGHI (840 United States of America), T. S. FIELD (124 Canada), A. JIN (124 Canada), T. ASIL (792 Turkey), J. M. BOULANGER (124 Canada), M. D. HILL (124 Canada), M. GOYAL (124 Canada), A. M. DEMCHUK (124 Canada) and B. K. MENON (124 Canada)
Edition
NEURORADIOLOGY, NEW YORK, SPRINGER, 2020, 0028-3940
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.804
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115996
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000495942400003
Keywords in English
Acute ischemic stroke; Thrombus permeability; Recanalization therapies; NCCT; CTA
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 31/8/2020 12:13, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Purpose To compare the association of different measures of intracranial thrombus permeability on non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) with recanalization with or without intravenous alteplase. Methods Patients with anterior circulation occlusion from the INTERRSeCT study were included. Thrombus permeability was measured on non-contrast CT and CTA using the following methods: [1] automated method, mean attenuation increase on co-registered thin (< 2.5 mm) CTA/NCCT; [2] semi-automated method, maximum attenuation increase on non-registered CTA/NCCT (Delta HUmax); [3] manual method, maximum attenuation on CTA (HUmax); and [4] visual method, residual flow grade. Primary outcome was recanalization with intravenous alteplase on the revised AOL scale (2b/3). Regression models were compared using C-statistic, Akaike (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Results Four hundred eighty patients were included in this analysis. Statistical models using methods 2, 3, and 4 were similar in their ability to discriminate recanalizers from non-recanalizers (C-statistic 0.667, 0.683, and 0.634, respectively); method 3 had the least information loss (AIC = 483.8; BIC = 492.2). A HUmax >= 89 measured with method 3 provided optimal sensitivity and specificity in discriminating recanalizers from non-recanalizers [recanalization 55.4% (95%CI 46.2-64.6) when HUmax > 89 vs. 16.8% (95%CI 13.0-20.6) when HUmax <= 89]. In sensitivity analyses restricted to patients with co-registered CTA/NCCT (n = 88), methods 1-4 predicted recanalization similarly (C-statistic 0.641, 0.688, 0.640, 0.648, respectively) with Method 2 having the least information loss (AIC 104.8, BIC 109.8). Conclusion Simple methods that measure thrombus permeability are as reliable as complex image processing methods in discriminating recanalizers from non-recanalizers.