Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Could the 2017 ILAE and the four-dimensional epilepsy classifications be merged to a new "Integrated Epilepsy Classification"?
ROSENOW, F., N. AKAMATSU, T. BAST, S. BAUER, C. BAUMGARTNER et. al.Basic information
Original name
Could the 2017 ILAE and the four-dimensional epilepsy classifications be merged to a new "Integrated Epilepsy Classification"?
Authors
ROSENOW, F. (276 Germany, guarantor), N. AKAMATSU (392 Japan), T. BAST (276 Germany), S. BAUER (276 Germany), C. BAUMGARTNER (40 Austria), S. BENBADIS (840 United States of America), A. BERMEO-OVALLE (840 United States of America), S. BEYENBURG (442 Luxembourg), A. BLEASEL (36 Australia), A. BOZORGI (840 United States of America), Milan BRÁZDIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), M. CARRENO (724 Spain), N. DELANTY (372 Ireland), M. DEVEREAUX (840 United States of America), J. DUNCAN (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), G. F. B. VACA (840 United States of America), S. FRANCIONE (380 Italy), N. G. LOSARCOS (840 United States of America), L. GHANMA (840 United States of America), A. GIL-NAGEL (724 Spain), H. HAMER (276 Germany), H. HOLTHAUSEN (276 Germany), S. J. OMIDI (840 United States of America), P. KAHANE (250 France), G. KALAMANGALAM (840 United States of America), A. KANNER (840 United States of America), S. KNAKE (276 Germany), S. KOVAC (276 Germany), K. KRAKOW (276 Germany), G. KRAMER (756 Switzerland), G. KURLEMANN (276 Germany), N. LACUEY (840 United States of America), P. LANDAZURI (840 United States of America), S. H. LIM (702 Singapore), L. V. LONDONO (170 Colombia), G. LORUSSO (380 Italy), H. LUDERS (276 Germany), J. MANI (356 India), R. MATSUMOTO (392 Japan), J. MILLER (840 United States of America), S. NOACHTAR (276 Germany), R. O DWYER (840 United States of America), A. PALMINI (76 Brazil), J. PARK (840 United States of America), P. S. REIF (276 Germany), J. REMI (372 Ireland), A. C. SAKAMOTO (76 Brazil), B. SCHMITZ (276 Germany), S. SCHUBERT-BAST (276 Germany), S. SCHUELE (840 United States of America), A. SHAHID (840 United States of America), B. STEINHOFF (276 Germany), A. STRZELCZYK (276 Germany), C. A. SZABO (840 United States of America), N. TANDON (840 United States of America), K. TERADA (392 Japan), M. TOLEDO (724 Spain), W. V. BOAS (528 Netherlands), M. WALKER (840 United States of America) and P. WIDDESS-WALSH (372 Ireland)
Edition
Seizure-European journal of epilepsy, London, W.B. Saunders Ltd. 2020, 1059-1311
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.184
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115998
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000537574100005
Keywords in English
Epilepsy classification; 2017 ILAE classification; Semiological seizure classification; Classification merger; Integrated epilepsy classsifcation; Four-dimensional epilepsy; Classification
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 16/7/2020 07:47, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Over the last few decades the ILAE classifications for seizures and epilepsies (ILAE-EC) have been updated repeatedly to reflect the substantial progress that has been made in diagnosis and understanding of the etiology of epilepsies and seizures and to correct some of the shortcomings of the terminology used by the original taxonomy from the 1980s. However, these proposals have not been universally accepted or used in routine clinical practice. During the same period, a separate classification known as the "Four-dimensional epilepsy classification" (4D-EC) was developed which includes a seizure classification based exclusively on ictal symptomatology, which has been tested and adapted over the years. The extensive arguments for and against these two classification systems made in the past have mainly focused on the shortcomings of each system, presuming that they are incompatible. As a further more detailed discussion of the differences seemed relatively unproductive, we here review and assess the concordance between these two approaches that has evolved over time, to consider whether a classification incorporating the best aspects of the two approaches is feasible. To facilitate further discussion in this direction we outline a concrete proposal showing how such a compromise could be accomplished, the "Integrated Epilepsy Classification". This consists of five categories derived to different degrees from both of the classification systems: 1) a "Headline" summarizing localization and etiology for the less specialized users, 2) "Seizure type(s)", 3) "Epilepsy type" (focal, generalized or unknown allowing to add the epilepsy syndrome if available), 4) "Etiology", and 5) "Comorbidities & patient preferences".