BACHOREC, Erik, Ivan HORACEK, Pavel HULVA, Adam KONEČNÝ, Radek LUCAN, Petr JEDLICKA, Wael SHOHDI, Simon RERUCHA, Mounir ABI-SAID and Tomáš BARTONIČKA. Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives. Journal of Zoology. Hoboken: Wiley, 2020, vol. 312, No 2, p. 111-121. ISSN 0952-8369. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12816.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives
Authors BACHOREC, Erik (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Ivan HORACEK, Pavel HULVA, Adam KONEČNÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Radek LUCAN, Petr JEDLICKA, Wael SHOHDI, Simon RERUCHA, Mounir ABI-SAID and Tomáš BARTONIČKA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Journal of Zoology, Hoboken, Wiley, 2020, 0952-8369.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 10613 Zoology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.322
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14310/20:00113933
Organization unit Faculty of Science
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12816
UT WoS 000554390900001
Keywords in English roosting; roosting behaviour; associations; relatedness; Rousettus aegyptiacus; fruit bats; network analysis; social dynamics
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS., učo 437722. Changed: 12/10/2020 11:29.
Abstract
Roosts provide bats with place for daytime sheltering, protection from weather and predators, mating, and social interaction. Movements between multiple roosts are often necessary, either due to limited roost life, changes in roost conditions or demands at different times of the year. Information transfer is an important contributor to day-roosting behaviour and typically exhibits non-random social assortment dynamics. Some individuals appear to explore and share roost discoveries more often than others, though it remains unclear whether associations are stronger between close relatives than less related individuals. In the present study, network analysis, in combination with genetic and spatial data, was used to explore the roosting behaviour of Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) within an isolated deme. Our results showed that the roosts had distinct core-periphery structure. The core of the winter roost network was represented by only two roosts, while in spring, the season of food scarcity, the core was represented by multiple roosts, suggesting their potential role as centres, where information about roosts and foraging sites is exchanged. We found no relationship between relatedness and roost sharing over two seasons. These results provide strong support that Egyptian fruit bats do not roost preferentially with relatives, in contrast to many animal populations where individuals preferentially associate with kin.
Links
IAA601110905, research and development projectName: Evoluční biogeografie kaloně Rousettus aegyptiacus ve středozemní oblasti.
Investor: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Evolutionary biogeography of a fruit-bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus, in the Mediterranean region
MUNI/A/1098/2019, interní kód MUName: Výzkum Ekologických a Evolučních Principů na modelu obratlovců a jejich parazitů
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 30/9/2024 00:34