J 2020

Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

RIAD, Abanoub, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Veronika CHUCHMOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

Authors

Edition

Research Square, United States, American Journal Experts (AJE), 2020

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30208 Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

Keywords in English

Meta-Analysis, Microbiota, Oral Hygiene, Preventive Dentistry, Systematic Review

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 14/3/2023 12:51, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

Background: Subclinical changes in response to different types of toothbrushes represent a challenging knowledge gap in the context of self-administered oral hygiene regimes; therefore, this systematic review will be the first to evaluate the oral microbiome response to powered versus manual toothbrushes. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review using the Cochrane Handbook’s guidelines and will adhere to a standardized reporting format: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in the following databases for published studies: Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Dissertations Theses Global, Bibliographia Medica Cechoslovaca, and Dentistry Oral Sciences Source. Following a two-level screening process, data including the full reference, objectives, target population, description of the intervention and control intervention, outcome measures, design, length of the post-intervention follow-up period, and the study results will be extracted, synthesized, and reported. Risk of bias and quality of the studies will also be assessed. Discussion: No primary data collection will be undertaken; therefore, no formal ethical assessment is required. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Registration: The protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020153557) since April 28th, 2020.

Links

MUNI/A/1608/2020, interní kód MU
Name: Prohlubování znalostí v oblasti zdravotních rizik a benefitů výživy, prostředí a životního stylu III
Investor: Masaryk University
2019-1-CZ01-KA202-061350, interní kód MU
Name: Strategic Partnership in Innovation and Development of Evidence-Based Healthcare (Acronym: SPIDER)
Investor: European Union, Strategic Partnerships in the field of education, training and youth