Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
RIAD, Abanoub, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Veronika CHUCHMOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Authors
RIAD, Abanoub, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Veronika CHUCHMOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ, Martin KRSEK and Miloslav KLUGAR
Edition
Research Square, United States, American Journal Experts (AJE), 2020
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30208 Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
Keywords in English
Meta-Analysis, Microbiota, Oral Hygiene, Preventive Dentistry, Systematic Review
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 14/3/2023 12:51, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Background: Subclinical changes in response to different types of toothbrushes represent a challenging knowledge gap in the context of self-administered oral hygiene regimes; therefore, this systematic review will be the first to evaluate the oral microbiome response to powered versus manual toothbrushes. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review using the Cochrane Handbook’s guidelines and will adhere to a standardized reporting format: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in the following databases for published studies: Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Dissertations Theses Global, Bibliographia Medica Cechoslovaca, and Dentistry Oral Sciences Source. Following a two-level screening process, data including the full reference, objectives, target population, description of the intervention and control intervention, outcome measures, design, length of the post-intervention follow-up period, and the study results will be extracted, synthesized, and reported. Risk of bias and quality of the studies will also be assessed. Discussion: No primary data collection will be undertaken; therefore, no formal ethical assessment is required. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Registration: The protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020153557) since April 28th, 2020.
Links
MUNI/A/1608/2020, interní kód MU |
| ||
2019-1-CZ01-KA202-061350, interní kód MU |
|