Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1675056,
author = {Riad, Abanoub and Klugarová, Jitka and Chuchmová, Veronika and Slezáková, Simona and Pokorná, Andrea and Krsek, Martin and Klugar, Miloslav},
article_location = {United States},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34636/v1},
keywords = {Meta-Analysis, Microbiota, Oral Hygiene, Preventive Dentistry, Systematic Review},
language = {eng},
journal = {Research Square},
title = {Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis},
url = {https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-34636/v1},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1675056
AU - Riad, Abanoub - Klugarová, Jitka - Chuchmová, Veronika - Slezáková, Simona - Pokorná, Andrea - Krsek, Martin - Klugar, Miloslav
PY - 2020
TI - Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
JF - Research Square
PB - American Journal Experts (AJE)
KW - Meta-Analysis, Microbiota, Oral Hygiene, Preventive Dentistry, Systematic Review
UR - https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-34636/v1
N2 - Background: Subclinical changes in response to different types of toothbrushes represent a challenging knowledge gap in the context of self-administered oral hygiene regimes; therefore, this systematic review will be the first to evaluate the oral microbiome response to powered versus manual toothbrushes. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review using the Cochrane Handbook’s guidelines and will adhere to a standardized reporting format: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in the following databases for published studies: Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Dissertations Theses Global, Bibliographia Medica Cechoslovaca, and Dentistry Oral Sciences Source. Following a two-level screening process, data including the full reference, objectives, target population, description of the intervention and control intervention, outcome measures, design, length of the post-intervention follow-up period, and the study results will be extracted, synthesized, and reported. Risk of bias and quality of the studies will also be assessed. Discussion: No primary data collection will be undertaken; therefore, no formal ethical assessment is required. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Registration: The protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020153557) since April 28th, 2020.
ER -
RIAD, Abanoub, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, Veronika CHUCHMOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ, Andrea POKORNÁ, Martin KRSEK and Miloslav KLUGAR. Oral Microbiome Response to Powered vs Manual Toothbrush: Protocol for a Systematic Review \&{} Meta-Analysis. Online. \textit{Research Square}. United States: American Journal Experts (AJE), 2020. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-34636/v1. [citováno 2024-04-24]
|
