Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
Comparison between success rates for smokers re-treated by a smokers' clinic and success rates for smokers treated for the first time
STEPANKOVA, Lenka, Eva KRALIKOVA, Kamila ZVOLSKA, Alexandra PANKOVA, Zuzana ADAMCEKOVA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Comparison between success rates for smokers re-treated by a smokers' clinic and success rates for smokers treated for the first time
Authors
STEPANKOVA, Lenka (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Eva KRALIKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Kamila ZVOLSKA (203 Czech Republic), Alexandra PANKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Zuzana ADAMCEKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Matyáš KUHN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Derek NOLAND (840 United States of America)
Edition
ADDICTION, HOBOKEN, WILEY, 2021, 0965-2140
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30312 Substance abuse
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 7.256
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00120695
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000549501100001
Keywords in English
Mental health; nicotine; re-treatment; tobacco; tobacco dependence; tobacco use disorder; pharmacotherapy; varenicline
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 10/8/2023 09:52, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
AimsTo compare success rates and characteristics of smokers treated a second time by a smokers' clinic with success rates of their first treatment. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingTobacco Dependence Treatment clinic in Prague, Czech Republic, between 2005 and 2017. ParticipantsA total of 5225 smokers treated either once (n = 5006, single treatment sample, SS) or also second time (n = 219, re-treated sample, RS), on average 4.47 years after the first visit. InterventionSmokers received intensive treatment of tobacco dependence with pharmacotherapy options. Outcomes were evaluated after 1 year. In case of failure or relapse, participants could undergo re-treatment in the same setting at least 1 year after the start of the first treatment. MeasurementsTwelve-month self-reported continuous abstinence; CO-validated (<= 6 parts per million); number of visits; type of pharmacotherapy; mental health history; Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence; time between first and second treatment. ResultsThe abstinence rate in the SS was 34.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 33.4%, 36.1%] and in the RS was 37% (95% CI = 30.6%, 43.8%) and 39.7% (95% CI = 33.2%, 45.5%) for their first and second treatments, respectively. The samples were comparable on smoking and socio-demographic characteristics and pharmacotherapy used, but the RS in the second treatment had a higher prevalence of diagnosed mental health disorder at 39.3% (95% CI = 32.8%; 46.1%) compared with 23.7% (95% CI = 22.5%; 24.9%) in the SS. Participants who initiated their second quit attempt 1 to 2 years after the first one were less successful than those who initiated their second quit attempt later (25 versus 43%; P < 0.05). The results of the first treatment cycle were not found to be a reliable predictor for outcomes of the second cycle of treatment in univariate or multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.70-2.63, P = 0.373). ConclusionIn Prague, Czech Republic, smokers re-attending stop-smoking treatment more than 2 years after their previous quit attempt appear to achieve similar success rates to those being treated for the first time.