J 2020

Quality of life in patients with non-healing wounds, with particular focus on assesment tools-a literature review

KRUPOVÁ, Lenka a Andrea POKORNÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Quality of life in patients with non-healing wounds, with particular focus on assesment tools-a literature review

Autoři

KRUPOVÁ, Lenka (garant) a Andrea POKORNÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, Lékařská fakulta Ostravské univerzity, 2020, 2336-3517

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30307 Nursing

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/20:00116532

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0010

Klíčová slova anglicky

Assessment tools; Chronic wounds; non-healing wounds; quality of life; review

Štítky

rivok
Změněno: 12. 5. 2021 13:58, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze published studies focusing on quality of life (QoL) in patients with non-healing wounds, with particular focus on assessment tools. Design: Type of study – literature review. Methods: Articles focusing on QoL in patients with non-healing wounds were searched for in various electronic databases using relevant terms. The search was limited to articles in English issued between January 2014 and April 2019, in the electronic databases Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL. Results: In total, 24 studies were found which met the established criteria. Conclusion: Non-healing wounds significantly affect patients' QoL. Research is leading towards the creation of a standardized QoL tool in patients with chronic wounds, which could be included in the wound care standard care protocol. There are many generic and specific tools for evaluating QoL in patients with non-healing wounds, differing in length and complexity. The Wound-QoL was created by comparing and simplifying proven tools, and the follow-up research has proven it to be internally consistent, valid and reliable, and, due to its ease of use, suitable for re-measuring QoL.
Zobrazeno: 5. 11. 2024 18:33