= 3
points) of falls. Self-selected gait speed (the independent
variable) was estimated with a pressure platform (Zebris
Company, Munich, Germany). Results: Mean gait speed was 0.95
m/s. Of the total sample, 53.30% and 33.30% reported foot pain
and had higher risk of falls. For foot pain and the risk of
falls, gait speed cut-off values were 0.88 m/s and 0.85 m/s
(area under the curve = 0.80 and 0.83, standard error = 0.043
and 0.043, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for foot pain and the risk
of falls was 66.20% and 85.90% and specificity was 84.80% and
69.00%. Slower gait speed was associated with higher prevalence
of foot pain (OR = 10.92, 95% CI 4.28 to 27.89, p < 0.001) and
higher risk of falls (OR = 13.59, 95% CI 5.45 to 33.87, p <
0.001). Conclusion: Proposed gait speed values of 0.88 m/s and
0.85 m/s may be used in clinical settings to predict foot pain
and the risk of falls among community-dwelling older women.">
Gait Speed as a Screening Tool for Foot Pain and the Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
STEFAN, Lovro (191 Croatia), Mario KASOVIĆ (191 Croatia, belonging to the institution) and Martin ZVONAŘ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Clinical Interventions in Aging, Auckland, DOVE MEDICAL PRESS, 2020, 1178-1998
Purpose: The main purpose of the study was to establish a gait speed cut-off value to predict foot pain and the risk of falls among community-dwelling older adults. Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, one-hundred and twenty White older women speaking Croatian (mean +/- SD age 71.02 +/- 6.78 years, height 161.77 +/- 6.23 cm, weight 70.29 +/- 12.97 kg, body mass index 26.79 +/- 4.42 kg/m2) were recruited. The prevalence of foot pain was assessed by a single-item question and the risk of falls by the Downtown Fall Risk Index with a proposed cut-off value of "low risk" (<3 points) vs "high risk" (>= 3 points) of falls. Self-selected gait speed (the independent variable) was estimated with a pressure platform (Zebris Company, Munich, Germany). Results: Mean gait speed was 0.95 m/s. Of the total sample, 53.30% and 33.30% reported foot pain and had higher risk of falls. For foot pain and the risk of falls, gait speed cut-off values were 0.88 m/s and 0.85 m/s (area under the curve = 0.80 and 0.83, standard error = 0.043 and 0.043, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for foot pain and the risk of falls was 66.20% and 85.90% and specificity was 84.80% and 69.00%. Slower gait speed was associated with higher prevalence of foot pain (OR = 10.92, 95% CI 4.28 to 27.89, p < 0.001) and higher risk of falls (OR = 13.59, 95% CI 5.45 to 33.87, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Proposed gait speed values of 0.88 m/s and 0.85 m/s may be used in clinical settings to predict foot pain and the risk of falls among community-dwelling older women.
STEFAN, Lovro, Mario KASOVIĆ and Martin ZVONAŘ. Gait Speed as a Screening Tool for Foot Pain and the Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical Interventions in Aging. Auckland: DOVE MEDICAL PRESS, 2020, vol. 15, September 2020, p. 1569-1574. ISSN 1178-1998. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S260931.
@article{1682277, author = {Stefan, Lovro and Kasović, Mario and Zvonař, Martin}, article_location = {Auckland}, article_number = {September 2020}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S260931}, keywords = {velocity; discomfort; elderly; risk; falls}, language = {eng}, issn = {1178-1998}, journal = {Clinical Interventions in Aging}, title = {Gait Speed as a Screening Tool for Foot Pain and the Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Study}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481277/}, volume = {15}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1682277 AU - Stefan, Lovro - Kasović, Mario - Zvonař, Martin PY - 2020 TI - Gait Speed as a Screening Tool for Foot Pain and the Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Study JF - Clinical Interventions in Aging VL - 15 IS - September 2020 SP - 1569-1574 EP - 1569-1574 PB - DOVE MEDICAL PRESS SN - 11781998 KW - velocity KW - discomfort KW - elderly KW - risk KW - falls UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481277/ L2 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481277/ N2 - Purpose: The main purpose of the study was to establish a gait speed cut-off value to predict foot pain and the risk of falls among community-dwelling older adults. Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, one-hundred and twenty White older women speaking Croatian (mean +/- SD age 71.02 +/- 6.78 years, height 161.77 +/- 6.23 cm, weight 70.29 +/- 12.97 kg, body mass index 26.79 +/- 4.42 kg/m2) were recruited. The prevalence of foot pain was assessed by a single-item question and the risk of falls by the Downtown Fall Risk Index with a proposed cut-off value of "low risk" (<3 points) vs "high risk" (>= 3 points) of falls. Self-selected gait speed (the independent variable) was estimated with a pressure platform (Zebris Company, Munich, Germany). Results: Mean gait speed was 0.95 m/s. Of the total sample, 53.30% and 33.30% reported foot pain and had higher risk of falls. For foot pain and the risk of falls, gait speed cut-off values were 0.88 m/s and 0.85 m/s (area under the curve = 0.80 and 0.83, standard error = 0.043 and 0.043, p < 0.001). Sensitivity for foot pain and the risk of falls was 66.20% and 85.90% and specificity was 84.80% and 69.00%. Slower gait speed was associated with higher prevalence of foot pain (OR = 10.92, 95% CI 4.28 to 27.89, p < 0.001) and higher risk of falls (OR = 13.59, 95% CI 5.45 to 33.87, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Proposed gait speed values of 0.88 m/s and 0.85 m/s may be used in clinical settings to predict foot pain and the risk of falls among community-dwelling older women. ER -
STEFAN, Lovro, Mario KASOVI$\backslash$'C and Martin ZVONAŘ. Gait Speed as a Screening Tool for Foot Pain and the Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. \textit{Clinical Interventions in Aging}. Auckland: DOVE MEDICAL PRESS, 2020, vol.~15, September 2020, p.~1569-1574. ISSN~1178-1998. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S260931.