Detailed Information on Publication Record

MORARU, Madalina Bianca and Galina CORNELISSE. Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance? In Moraru Madalina, Cornelisse Galina, and de Bruycker Philippe. Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union. 1 edition. UK: Hart, 2020, p. 17-41. Modern Studies in European Law. ISBN 978-1-5099-2295-6.

Other formats: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1687558
AU  - Moraru, Madalina Bianca - Cornelisse, Galina
PY  - 2020
TI  - Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?
VL  - Modern Studies in European Law
PB  - Hart
CY  - UK
SN  - 9781509922956
KW  - Return Directive
KW  - judicial interaction
KW  - EU law
KW  - CJEU
KW  - ECHR
UR  - https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/law-and-judicial-dialogue-on-the-return-of-irregular-migrants-from-the-european-union-9781509922956/
L2  - https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/law-and-judicial-dialogue-on-the-return-of-irregular-migrants-from-the-european-union-9781509922956/
N2  - This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.
ER  -

Basic information
Original name	Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?
Authors	MORARU, Madalina Bianca (642 Romania, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Galina CORNELISSE.
Edition	1 edition. UK, Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, p. 17-41, 25 pp. Modern Studies in European Law, 2020.
Publisher	Hart

Other information
Original language	English
Type of outcome	Chapter(s) of a specialized book
Field of Study	50501 Law
Country of publisher	United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree	is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form	printed version "print"
WWW	Web nakladatele
RIV identification code	RIV/00216224:14220/20:00116753
Organization unit	Faculty of Law
ISBN	978-1-5099-2295-6
Keywords in English	Return Directive; judicial interaction; EU law; CJEU; ECHR
Tags	rivok, topvydavatel
Tags	International impact, Reviewed
Changed by	Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 29/10/2020 14:03.

Abstract
This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.

Abstract

This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.