Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?
MORARU, Madalina Bianca and Galina CORNELISSEBasic information
Original name
Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?
Authors
MORARU, Madalina Bianca (642 Romania, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Galina CORNELISSE
Edition
1 edition. UK, Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, p. 17-41, 25 pp. Modern Studies in European Law, 2020
Publisher
Hart
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/20:00116753
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-1-5099-2295-6
Keywords in English
Return Directive; judicial interaction; EU law; CJEU; ECHR
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 29/10/2020 14:03, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Abstract
V originále
This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.