J 2020

Current density as routine parameter for description of ionic membrane current: is it always the best option?

KULA, Roman, Markéta BÉBAROVÁ, Peter MATEJOVIČ, Jiří ŠIMURDA, Michal PÁSEK et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Current density as routine parameter for description of ionic membrane current: is it always the best option?

Authors

KULA, Roman (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Markéta BÉBAROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Peter MATEJOVIČ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří ŠIMURDA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Michal PÁSEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, OXFORD, PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 2020, 0079-6107

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10608 Biochemistry and molecular biology

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.667

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/20:00118627

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.11.011

UT WoS

000582745400005

Keywords in English

Ionic current; Current density; Current-capacitance correlation; Current-capacitance proportionality; Rat cardiomyocyte; Normalisation by ratio

Tags

14110515, rivok

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/5/2021 14:14, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

The current density (J) is a parameter routinely used to characterize individual ionic membrane currents. Its evaluation is based on the presumption that the magnitude of whole-cell ionic membrane current (I) is directly proportional to the cell membrane capacitance (C), i.e. I positively and strongly correlates with C and the regression line describing I-C relation intersects the y-axis close to the origin of coordinates. We aimed to prove the presumption in several examples and find whether the conversion of I to J could be always beneficial. I-C relation was analysed in several potassium currents, measured in rat atrial myocytes (in inward rectifier currents, I-K1, and both the constitutively active and acetylcholine-induced components of acetylcholine-sensitive current, I-K(Ach)CONST and I-K(Ach)ACH), and in rat ventricular myocytes (transient outward current I-to). I-C correlation was estimated by the Pearson coefficient (r). A coefficient (k) was newly suggested describing deviation of the regression intercept from zero in currents with considerable r value. Based on mathematical simulations, I was satisfactorily proportional to C when r >= 0.6 and k <= 0.2 which was fulfilled in I-K1 and I-K(Ach)ACH (r = 0.84, k = 0.20, and r = 0.61, k = 0.06, respectively). IeC correlation was significantly positive, but weak in I-K(Ach)CONST (r = 0.42), and virtually missing in Ito (r = 0.04). The impaired I-C proportionality in I-K(Ach)CONST and Ito likely reflects heterogeneity of the channel expression. We conclude that the conversion of I to J should be avoided when I-C proportionality is absent. Otherwise, serious misinterpretation of data may arise. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Links

NV16-30571A, research and development project
Name: Klinický význam a elektrofyziologické zhodnocení mutace c.926C>T genu KCNQ1 (p.T309I) jako možné „founder mutation“ syndromu dlouhého intervalu QT
Displayed: 11/11/2024 07:42