Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Natural forests of Pinus pinea in western Turkey: a priority for conservation
BONARI, Gianmaria, Kryštof CHYTRÝ, Süleyman ÇOBAN and Milan CHYTRÝBasic information
Original name
Natural forests of Pinus pinea in western Turkey: a priority for conservation
Authors
BONARI, Gianmaria (380 Italy, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Kryštof CHYTRÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Süleyman ÇOBAN and Milan CHYTRÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Biodiversity and Conservation, Dordrecht, Springer, 2020, 0960-3115
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10511 Environmental sciences
Country of publisher
Netherlands
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.549
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/20:00114596
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000573194200001
Keywords in English
Ecological niche; Habitat; Mediterranean; Pine; Pinus brutia; Soil
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 25/1/2021 18:15, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
Identifying, surveying, monitoring and protecting natural forests is a major task in conservation biology. However, it is often challenging to identify which forest is natural, especially in human-altered regions such as the Mediterranean. Consequently, the distributions of natural Mediterranean forest types and their underlying factors are often unclear. Here, we attempt to explain the restricted and scattered distribution of natural Pinus pinea (Stone pine) forests in western Anatolia (Turkey) by comparing it with the distribution and ecology of the widespread Pinus brutia (Turkish pine) forests in this area. We used climatic and topographic predictors to test for differences between forests dominated by these two pine species. We modelled the realized niches of both pine species using the most relevant climatic predictors. Then, we compared soil data collected in the field, partly complemented with those published in the literature. We found small differences in climatic (precipitation and temperature) and topographic characteristics between the two forest types, which did not adequately explain the differences in the distribution range of P. brutia and P. pinea dominated forests. Our data suggest that these two forest types mainly differ in soil characteristics. The primary habitat of natural P. pinea forests is characterized by a low soil pH and calcium content. The rare occurrence of such soil conditions in western Anatolia likely shapes the scattered distribution of P. pinea forests. Our study suggests that natural P. pinea forests are rare habitats that should be in the focus of nature conservation. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
Links
| GX19-28491X, research and development project |
|