Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
The cutoff for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial cancer revisited: a European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study
WEELDEN, Willem Janvan, Casper REIJNEN, Heidi V.N. KÜSTERS-VANDEVELDE, Johan BULTEN, Peter BULT et. al.Basic information
Original name
The cutoff for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial cancer revisited: a European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study
Authors
WEELDEN, Willem Janvan (guarantor), Casper REIJNEN, Heidi V.N. KÜSTERS-VANDEVELDE, Johan BULTEN, Peter BULT, Samuel LEUNG, Nicole C.M. VISSER, Maria SANTACANA, Peter BRONSERT, Marc HIRSCHFELD, Eva COLAS, Antonio GIL-MORENO, Armando REQUES, Gemma MANCEBO, Jutta HUVILA, Martin KOSKAS, Vít WEINBERGER (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Markéta BEDNAŘÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jitka HAUSNEROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Marc P.L.M. SNIJDERS, Xavier MATIAS-GUIU and Frédéric AMANT
Edition
Human Pathology, Philadelphia, Elseveir, 2021, 0046-8177
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30109 Pathology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.526
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121057
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000632654300007
Keywords in English
Endometrial cancer; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; Cutoff; Prognostic biomarker
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 15/6/2021 11:04, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
There is no consensus on the cutoff for positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, we determined the cutoff value for ER and PR expression with the strongest prognostic impact on the outcome. Immunohistochemical expression of ER and PR was scored as a percentage of positive EC cell nuclei. Cutoff values were related to disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using sensitivity, specificity, and multivariable regression analysis. The results were validated in an independent cohort. The study cohort (n = 527) included 82% of grade 1–2 and 18% of grade 3 EC. Specificity for DSS and DFS was highest for the cutoff values of 1–30%. Sensitivity was highest for the cutoff values of 80–90%. ER and PR expression were independent markers for DSS at cutoff values of 10% and 80%. Consequently, three subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes were identified: 0–10% of ER/PR expression with, unfavorable outcome (5-year DSS = 75.9–83.3%); 20–80% of ER/PR expression with, intermediate outcome (5-year DSS = 93.0–93.9%); and 90–100% of ER/PR expression with, favorable outcome (5-year DSS = 97.8–100%). The association between ER/PR subgroups and outcomes was confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 265). We propose classification of ER and PR expression based on a high-risk (0–10%), intermediate-risk (20–80%), and low-risk (90–100%) group.