Tam a zase zpátky? Migrační detence v připravované reformě CEAS

BOKOVÁ, Terezie. Tam a zase zpátky? Migrační detence v připravované reformě CEAS (There and back again? The story of immigration detention in proposed reform of CEAS). Online. In Pavel Kandalec, Jiří Valdhans (eds.). Dny práva 2019: Část II. - Právo na osobní svobodu. 1st ed. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2020, p. 34-66. ISBN 978-80-210-9662-2.

Basic information

• Original name: Tam a zase zpátky? Migrační detence v připravované reformě CEAS
• Name (in English): There and back again? The story of immigration detention in proposed reform of CEAS
• Authors: BOKOVÁ, Terezie.
• Edition: 1. vyd. Brno, Dny práva 2019: Část II. - Právo na osobní svobodu, p. 34-66, 33 pp. 2020.
• Publisher: Masarykova univerzita

Other information

• Original language: Czech
• Type of outcome: Proceedings paper
• Field of Study: 50501 Law
• Country of publisher: Czech Republic
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• Publication form: electronic version available online
• WWW: Open access sborníku
• Organization unit: Faculty of Law
• ISBN: 978-80-210-9662-2
• Keywords (in Czech): Zajištění; osobní svoboda; žadatel o mezinárodní ochranu; Společný evropský azylový systém
• Keywords in English: Detention; Personal Liberty; Applicant for International Protection; Common European Asylum System
• Tags: rivok
• Tags: Reviewed

Abstract (in English)

Since 2015, the EU institutions has been working on a reform of Common European Asylum System (CEAS), which is supposed to critically reflect experience with so called migration crisis of 2015–2016. From the human rights perspective, one of the most pressing issues that arose was the extent and material conditions of interferences with personal liberty of asylum seekers or irregular migrants. In 2019, we are still waiting for the legislative package to be approved. Despite the fact it is still work-in-progress, the paper will try to identify main principles of proposed legislation concerning immigration detention, to outline its trends and to assess if it meets requirements from the ECtHR and CJEU recent case law.