Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis
PELLETIER, J. P., J. P. RAYNAULD, M. DORAIS, L. BESSETTE, Eva DOKOUPILOVÁ et. al.Basic information
Original name
An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study (DISSCO): effect of diacerein vs celecoxib on symptoms in knee osteoarthritis
Authors
PELLETIER, J. P., J. P. RAYNAULD, M. DORAIS, L. BESSETTE, Eva DOKOUPILOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), F. MORIN, K. PAVELKA, P. PAIEMENT and J. MARTEL-PELLETIER (guarantor)
Edition
RHEUMATOLOGY, OXFORD, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2020, 1462-0324
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30104 Pharmacology and pharmacy
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 7.580
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14160/20:00118261
Organization unit
Faculty of Pharmacy
UT WoS
000606837500054
Keywords in English
diacerein; celecoxib; osteoarthritis; non-inferiority trial; SYSADOA
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 25/2/2021 08:18, Mgr. Hana Hurtová
Abstract
V originále
Objective. The objective of this study was to investigate whether diacerein has comparable efficacy with celecoxib in pain reduction for treatment in symptomatic knee OA patients. Methods. This randomized double-blind multicentre non-inferiority trial evaluated diacerein vs celecoxib treatment in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 and pain scoring >= 4 (10-cm VAS). Patients were randomized to 6 months of treatment with diacerein 50 mg (n = 1 87) once daily for 1 month and twice daily thereafter, or celecoxib 200mg (n =193) once daily. The primary outcome was the change in WOMAC pain score (0-50 cm) at 6 months, and the secondary outcomes were WOMAC sub-scores, VAS pain score, and the OMERACT-OARSI responder rate. Results. In the per protocol population, the adjusted mean change from baseline in the WOMAC pain score was -11.1 (0.9) with diacerein (n = 1 40) and -11.8(0.9) with celecoxib (n = 1 48). The intergroup difference was 0.7 (95% CI: -1.8, 3.2; P = 0.597), meeting the non-inferiority margin. Supportive analysis of the intention-to-treat population gave similar results. Other outcomes showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low and balanced between groups, but a greater incidence of diarrhoea occurred with diacerein (10.2% vs 3.7%). Diarrhoea was considered mild-to-moderate in all but one case with complete resolution. Conclusions. Diacerein was non-inferior to celecoxib in reducing knee OA pain and improving physical function. Diacerein also demonstrated a good safety profile.