J 2021

Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper

AKL, E. A., R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper

Authors

AKL, E. A. (guarantor), R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI, A. AGARWAL, B. S. ALPER, C. ALVA-DIAZ, L. AMATO, M. T. ANSARI, J. BROZEK, D. K. CHU, P. DAHM, A. J. DARZI, M. FALAVIGNA, G. GARTLEHNER, H. PARDO-HERNANDEZ, V. KING, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), M. W. M. LANGENDAM, C. LOCKWOOD, M. MAMMEN, A. G. MATHIOUDAKIS, M. MCCAUL, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. MINOZZI, R. A. MUSTAFA, F. NONINO, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, J. RIVA, R. RODIN, N. SEKERCIOGLU, N. SKOETZ, G. TRAVERSY, K. THAYER and H. SCHUNEMANN

Edition

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021, 0895-4356

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30304 Public and environmental health

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

Impact factor

Impact factor: 7.407

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121173

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.037

UT WoS

000608358000001

Keywords in English

GRADE; Urgent recommendation; Pandemic; Trustworthy guideline

Tags

14119612, 14119613, rivok

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 25/2/2021 12:45, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

Objectives: The aim of this study is to propose an approach for developing trustworthy recommendations as part of urgent responses (1-2 week) in the clinical, public health, and health systems fields. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a review of the literature, outlined a draft approach, refined the concept through iterative discussions, a workshop by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Rapid Guidelines project group, and obtained feedback from the larger Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. Results: A request for developing recommendations within 2 week is the usual trigger for an urgent response. Although the approach builds on the general principles of trustworthy guideline development, we highlight the following steps: (1) assess the level of urgency; (2) assess feasibility; (3) set up the organizational logistics; (4) specify the question(s); (5) collect the information needed; (6) assess the adequacy of identified information; (7) develop the recommendations using one of the 4 potential approaches: adopt existing recommendations, adapt existing recommendations, develop new recommendations using existing adequate systematic review, or develop new recommendations using expert panel input; and (8) consider an updating plan. Conclusion: An urgent response for developing recommendations requires building a cohesive, skilled, and highly motivated multidisciplinary team with the necessary clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise; adapting to shifting needs; complying with the principles of transparency; and properly managing conflicts of interest. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
Displayed: 15/11/2024 05:52