| AKL, E. A., R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI, A. AGARWAL, B. S. ALPER, C. ALVA-DIAZ, L. AMATO, M. T. ANSARI, J. BROZEK, D. K. CHU, P. DAHM, A. J. DARZI, M. FALAVIGNA, G. GARTLEHNER, H. PARDO-HERNANDEZ, V. KING, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, M. W. M. LANGENDAM, C. LOCKWOOD, M. MAMMEN, A. G. MATHIOUDAKIS, M. MCCAUL, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. MINOZZI, R. A. MUSTAFA, F. NONINO, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, J. RIVA, R. RODIN, N. SEKERCIOGLU, N. SKOETZ, G. TRAVERSY, K. THAYER and H. SCHUNEMANN. Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY. NEW YORK: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021, vol. 129, JAN 2021, p. 1-11. ISSN 0895-4356. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.037. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1746377,
author = {Akl, E. A. and Morgan, R. L. and Rooney, A. A. and Beverly, B. and Katikreddi, S. V. and Agarwal, A. and Alper, B. S. and AlvaandDiaz, C. and Amato, L. and Ansari, M. T. and Brozek, J. and Chu, D. K. and Dahm, P. and Darzi, A. J. and Falavigna, M. and Gartlehner, G. and PardoandHernandez, H. and King, V. and Klugarová, Jitka and Langendam, M. W. M. and Lockwood, C. and Mammen, M. and Mathioudakis, A. G. and McCaul, M. and Meerpohl, J. J. and Minozzi, S. and Mustafa, R. A. and Nonino, F. and Piggott, T. and Qaseem, A. and Riva, J. and Rodin, R. and Sekercioglu, N. and Skoetz, N. and Traversy, G. and Thayer, K. and Schunemann, H.},
article_location = {NEW YORK},
article_number = {JAN 2021},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.037},
keywords = {GRADE; Urgent recommendation; Pandemic; Trustworthy guideline},
language = {eng},
issn = {0895-4356},
journal = {JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY},
title = {Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620311239},
volume = {129},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1746377
AU - Akl, E. A. - Morgan, R. L. - Rooney, A. A. - Beverly, B. - Katikreddi, S. V. - Agarwal, A. - Alper, B. S. - Alva-Diaz, C. - Amato, L. - Ansari, M. T. - Brozek, J. - Chu, D. K. - Dahm, P. - Darzi, A. J. - Falavigna, M. - Gartlehner, G. - Pardo-Hernandez, H. - King, V. - Klugarová, Jitka - Langendam, M. W. M. - Lockwood, C. - Mammen, M. - Mathioudakis, A. G. - McCaul, M. - Meerpohl, J. J. - Minozzi, S. - Mustafa, R. A. - Nonino, F. - Piggott, T. - Qaseem, A. - Riva, J. - Rodin, R. - Sekercioglu, N. - Skoetz, N. - Traversy, G. - Thayer, K. - Schunemann, H.
PY - 2021
TI - Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
JF - JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
VL - 129
IS - JAN 2021
SP - 1-11
EP - 1-11
PB - ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
SN - 08954356
KW - GRADE
KW - Urgent recommendation
KW - Pandemic
KW - Trustworthy guideline
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435620311239
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study is to propose an approach for developing trustworthy recommendations as part of urgent responses (1-2 week) in the clinical, public health, and health systems fields. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a review of the literature, outlined a draft approach, refined the concept through iterative discussions, a workshop by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Rapid Guidelines project group, and obtained feedback from the larger Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. Results: A request for developing recommendations within 2 week is the usual trigger for an urgent response. Although the approach builds on the general principles of trustworthy guideline development, we highlight the following steps: (1) assess the level of urgency; (2) assess feasibility; (3) set up the organizational logistics; (4) specify the question(s); (5) collect the information needed; (6) assess the adequacy of identified information; (7) develop the recommendations using one of the 4 potential approaches: adopt existing recommendations, adapt existing recommendations, develop new recommendations using existing adequate systematic review, or develop new recommendations using expert panel input; and (8) consider an updating plan. Conclusion: An urgent response for developing recommendations requires building a cohesive, skilled, and highly motivated multidisciplinary team with the necessary clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise; adapting to shifting needs; complying with the principles of transparency; and properly managing conflicts of interest. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
ER -
AKL, E. A., R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI, A. AGARWAL, B. S. ALPER, C. ALVA-DIAZ, L. AMATO, M. T. ANSARI, J. BROZEK, D. K. CHU, P. DAHM, A. J. DARZI, M. FALAVIGNA, G. GARTLEHNER, H. PARDO-HERNANDEZ, V. KING, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, M. W. M. LANGENDAM, C. LOCKWOOD, M. MAMMEN, A. G. MATHIOUDAKIS, M. MCCAUL, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. MINOZZI, R. A. MUSTAFA, F. NONINO, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, J. RIVA, R. RODIN, N. SEKERCIOGLU, N. SKOETZ, G. TRAVERSY, K. THAYER and H. SCHUNEMANN. Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper. \textit{JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY}. NEW YORK: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021, vol.~129, JAN 2021, p.~1-11. ISSN~0895-4356. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.037.
|
