| DUDÁŠOVÁ, Ludmila, Jakub PROCHÁZKA, Martin VACULÍK and Timo LORENZ. Measuring psychological capital : Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12). PLOS ONE. San Francisco: Public Library of Science, 2021, vol. 16, No 3, p. 1-17. ISSN 1932-6203. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247114. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1749116,
author = {Dudášová, Ludmila and Procházka, Jakub and Vaculík, Martin and Lorenz, Timo},
article_location = {San Francisco},
article_number = {3},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247114},
keywords = {Psychological Capital; Hope; Self-Efficacy; Resilience; Optimism; Positive Work Psychology; Psychometrics},
language = {eng},
issn = {1932-6203},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
title = {Measuring psychological capital : Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12)},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247114},
volume = {16},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1749116
AU - Dudášová, Ludmila - Procházka, Jakub - Vaculík, Martin - Lorenz, Timo
PY - 2021
TI - Measuring psychological capital : Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12)
JF - PLOS ONE
VL - 16
IS - 3
SP - 1-17
EP - 1-17
PB - Public Library of Science
SN - 19326203
KW - Psychological Capital
KW - Hope
KW - Self-Efficacy
KW - Resilience
KW - Optimism
KW - Positive Work Psychology
KW - Psychometrics
UR - https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247114
N2 - This article provides information about the psychometric limitations of the original Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12) and suggests a revised version CPC-12R, a free-to-use measure of Psychological Capital. The investigation consisted of three studies: two of these identified psychometric limitations of the original scale, and the third presented the revised version of the scale. The first study did not confirm the hypothesized four-factor structure of the CPC-12 on a sample of Czech teachers (n = 282) and found psychometric limitations in the resilience subscale. The second study identified the same problem using secondary analyses of the original data from two samples of German employees (n = 202 and 321 respectively). The third study proposed a revised version of the scale with new items for resilience, and provided support for reliability and factorial validity of the new CPC-12R on a sample of Czech employees (n = 333). CPC-12R demonstrated a better fit to the theoretically supported model of Psychological Capital than CPC-12, and further displays adequate psychometric properties to be recommended for application in both research and practice.
ER -
DUDÁŠOVÁ, Ludmila, Jakub PROCHÁZKA, Martin VACULÍK and Timo LORENZ. Measuring psychological capital : Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12). \textit{PLOS ONE}. San Francisco: Public Library of Science, 2021, vol.~16, No~3, p.~1-17. ISSN~1932-6203. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247114.
|
